Assessing the Readability of Anesthesia-Related Patient Education Materials from Major Anesthesiology Organizations

Author:

Pashkova Anna1,Bangalore Raksha1,Tan Cynthia1,Svider Peter F.2,Korban Anna1,Yam Yee-Kuen1ORCID,Chaudhry Faraz1,Eloy Jean Anderson234,Eloy Jean Daniel1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anesthesiology, Rutgers University, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA

2. Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Rutgers University, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA

3. Department of Neurological Surgery, Rutgers University, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA

4. Center for Skull Base and Pituitary Surgery, Rutgers University, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA

Abstract

Introduction. The National Institutes of Health (NIH), American Medical Association (AMA), and the US Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS) recommend that patient education materials (PEMs) be written between the 4th to 6th grade reading level to ensure readability by the average American. In this study, we examine the reading levels of online patient education materials from major anesthesiology organizations. Methods. Readability analysis of PEMs found on the websites of anesthesiology organizations was performed using the Flesch Reading Ease score, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, Gunning Frequency of Gobbledygook, New Dale-Chall test, Coleman-Liau Index, New Fog Count, Raygor Readability Estimate, the FORCAST test, and the Fry Score. Results. Most patient educational materials from the websites of the anesthesiology organizations evaluated were written at or above the 10th grade reading level. Conclusions. Online patient education materials from the major anesthesiology societies are written at levels higher than an average American adult reading skill level and higher than recommended by National Institute of Health, American Medical Association, and US Department of Health and Human Services. Online resources should be revised to improve readability. Simplifying text, using shorter sentences and terms are strategies online resources can implement to improve readability. Future studies should incorporate comprehensibility, user-friendliness, and linguistic ease to further understand the implications on overall healthcare.

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

General Immunology and Microbiology,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Medicine

Reference28 articles.

1. FoxS.80% of internet users look for health information online2011Pew Internet & American Life Projecthttp://www.pewinternet.org/~/media/files/reports/2011/PIP_HealthTopics.pdf

2. Readability assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to facial fractures

3. Preparing for an Epidemic of Limited Health Literacy: Weathering the Perfect Storm

4. Health literacy: the gap between physicians and patients;R. S. Safeer;American Family Physician,2005

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3