Abstract
Background. Although the latest European and US guidelines recommend that early enteral nutrition (EN) be attempted in critically ill patients, there is still a lack of research on feeding strategies for patients after cardiac arrest (CA). Due to the unique pathophysiology following CA, it remains unknown whether evidence from other diseases can be applied in this condition. Objective. We aimed to explore the relationship between the timing of EN (within 48 hours or after 48 hours) and clinical outcomes and safety in CA. Method. From the MIMIC‐IV (version 2.2) database, we conducted this retrospective cohort study. A 1 : 1 propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was also conducted to prevent potential interference from confounders. Moreover, adjusted proportional hazards model regression models were used to adjust for prehospital and hospitalization characteristics to verify the independence of the association between early EN initiation and patient outcomes. Results. Of the initial 1286 patients, 670 were equally assigned to the early EN or delayed EN group after PSM. Patients in the early EN group had improved survival outcomes than those in the delayed EN group within 30 days (HR = 0.779, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.611‐0.994], p = 0.041). Similar results were shown at 90 and 180 days. However, there was no significant difference in neurological outcome between the two groups at 30 days (51% vs. 57%, odds ratio [OR] = 0.786, 95% CI [0.580–1.066], p = 0.070). Patients who underwent early EN had a lower risk of ileus than patients who underwent delayed EN (4% vs. 8%, OR = 0.461, 95% CI [0.233–0.909], p = 0.016). Moreover, patients who underwent early EN had shorter hospital stays. Conclusion. Early EN could be associated with improved survival outcomes for patients after CA. Further studies are needed to verify it. However, at present, we might consider early EN to be a more suitable feeding strategy for CA.