Fracture Strength and Marginal Adaptation of Conservative and Extended MOD Cavities Restored with Cention N

Author:

Firouzmandi Maryam1ORCID,Alavi Ali Asghar2ORCID,Jafarpour Dana3ORCID,Sadatsharifee Soroush4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Oral and Dental Disease Research Center, Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

2. Department of Operative Dentistry, Biomaterials Research Center, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

3. Biomaterials Research Center, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

4. Undergraduate Student, Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to compare the fracture strength and marginal adaptation of MOD cavities restored with Cention N, bonded Cention N, and resin composite, as well as to investigate the effect of cavity preparation volume on those properties. In this experimental study, 120 human maxillary premolars were randomly divided into six groups according to the type of restoration and cavity volume (n = 20): (I) conservative MOD restored with Cention N, (II) conservative MOD restored with bonded Cention N, (III) conservative MOD restored with Z250 resin composite, (IV) extended MOD restored with Cention N, (V) extended MOD restored with bonded Cention N, and (VI) extended MOD restored with Z250 resin composite. Fracture strength (MPa) was tested using a universal testing machine. To investigate marginal adaptation, polyvinyl-siloxane impressions were taken and poured with epoxy resin. Resin replicas were examined by SEM (×400) for marginal adaptation. ANOVA tests, Tukey’s test, and independent t-test were used to analyze data ( P  ≤ 0.05). Among conservative restorations, the fracture strength of bonded Cention N was significantly greater than that of Cention N ( P  = 0.001), while in the extended preparations, there was no significant difference between fracture strengths of different types of restorations ( P  = 0.579). In terms of marginal adaptation, there was no significant difference between different types of conservative restorations ( P  = 0.232). However, in extended preparations, composite showed significantly lower marginal adaptation than Cention N and bonded Cention N ( P  = 0.004 and P  = 0.045, respectively). Conservative preparations showed significantly greater fracture strength and marginal adaptation compared to extended ones in groups restored with composite. The volume of cavity preparation was shown to be effective in the materials fracture strength and marginal adaptation. Cention N showed promising results in terms of fracture strength and marginal adaptation.

Funder

Shiraz University of Medical Sciences

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

General Dentistry

Reference31 articles.

1. Alternatives for the restoration of posterior teeth;G. J. Christensen;International Dental Journal,1989

2. Microleakage of composite resin and glass ionomer cement restorations in retentive and nonretentive cervical cavity preparations

3. Resisting the curing contraction with adhesive composites

4. Polymerization shrinkage of visible-light-cured composites;A. Yap;Operative Dentistry,2000

5. Bulk-fill composites: a review of the current literature;A. Van Ende;Journal of Adhesive Dentistry,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3