Prevalence of the Patterns of Unhealthy Diet in the School and University Students of Iran: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Author:

Ahmadi Seyyed Amir YasinORCID,SoleimanvandiAzar NedaORCID,Roohravan Benis MahshidORCID,Mehrabi AliORCID,Vesal Azad RoyaORCID,Nojomi MarziehORCID

Abstract

Introduction. The present study was conducted to investigate the pooled prevalence rate of the different patterns of unhealthy diet among the school and university students of Iran. Methods. In this systematic review, the type of the main question was regarding prevalence and the effect measure was prevalence rate reported along with 95% confidence interval (CI). Data bases including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science as well as Google Scholar and Persian resources were used. The Newcastle–Ottawa scale (NOS) checklist was used for quality assessment of studies. Results. The extracted types of unhealthy diet in the present systematic review were “breakfast skipper,” “fast food,” “hydrogenated oils consumption,” “salty snacks,” “sweetened beverages,” “breakfast skipper,” “dinner skipper,” “launch skipper,” and “sweets.” The range of pooled prevalence for different types was 0.06–0.75. The data of 16,321 subjects included in six studies were analyzed. The pooled prevalence of unhealthy diet was 0.28 (95% CI: 0.23–0.33, I2 > 99%) overall, 0.25 (95% CI: 0.20–0.31, I2 > 99%) in school students and 0.37 (95% CI: 0.12–0.62, I2 > 99%) in university students. The most prevalent pattern was breakfast skipping 0.39 (95% CI: 0.28–0.50) followed by consumption of sweetened beverages 0.31 (95% CI: 0.20–0.43). The pooled prevalence range among the patterns was 0.06–0.75 (random effects for all). Conclusion. The pooled prevalence was 28% for unhealthy diet among the Iranian students (6% to 75% in different patterns). Although there was uncertainty regarding the pooled evidence, the whole of the mentioned range was clinically important for health policymakers. Decisions should be made on the basis of the patterns.

Funder

Iran University of Medical Sciences

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3