Effects of Natural Convalescent Factors Combined with Motor Intelligence Management on Patients’ Blood Pressure

Abstract

To explore the application of natural convalescent factors combined with exercise intelligence management in blood pressure control of patients with hypertension, 102 patients with hypertension who were admitted from January 2017 to August 2019 were selected as the research subjects. According to the odd-even number method, they were divided into two groups with 51 cases in each group. The control group was treated with natural convalescent factor therapy alone, and the observation group was treated with natural convalescent factor combined with motor intelligence management. The application effects of the two groups were compared. Before sports intelligence management, the levels of systolic blood pressure (SBP) in control group and observation group were (145.45 ± 8.44) mmHg (1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa) and (146.55 ± 8.37) mmHg, respectively; the diastolic blood pressure (DBP) levels of the control group and the observation group were (98.47 ± 3.48) mmHg and (98.94 ± 3.48) mmHg, respectively, with no statistical significance ( $P>0.05$ ). After the exercise intelligence management, the SBP levels of the control group and the observation group were (132.76 ± 4.48) mmHg and (130.06 ± 2.48) mmHg, respectively. The DBP levels of the control group and the observation group were (85.48 ± 5.38) mmHg and (83.47 ± 3.35) mmHg, respectively. The difference was statistically significant ( $P<0.05$ ). The scores of each index of quality of life in the observation group were higher than those in the control group, and the differences of physical function and psychological/mental scores were significant. The scores of physical function in the two groups before administration were (48.36 ± 1.69) and (48.74 ± 1.62), and the differences were not statistically significant ( $P>0.05$ ). After management, the physiological function scores of the two groups were (40.32 ± 1.33) and (32.15 ± 1.54) and the difference was statistically significant ( $P<0.05$ ). There were no significant differences in the psychological (30.75 ± 1.26)/mental scores (30.26 ± 1.48) between the two groups before management ( $P>0.05$ ), but there were significant differences in the psychological (25.30 ± 1.02)/mental scores (18.76 ± 1.36) between the two groups after management ( $P<0.05$ ). The combination of natural convalescent factors and intelligent exercise management can effectively control the blood pressure level and improve the quality of life of patients with hypertension, and the clinical application effect is good.