Digital Competence among Healthcare Leaders: A Mixed‐Methods Systematic Review

Author:

Laakkonen Noora,Jarva ErikaORCID,Hammarén MiraORCID,Kanste OutiORCID,Kääriäinen MariaORCID,Oikarinen AnneORCID,Mikkonen KristinaORCID

Abstract

Background. New evidence on the digital competencies of healthcare leaders can provide essential knowledge for building training for the leaders to ensure high‐quality patient care. Objective. The aim of this mixed‐methods systematic review was to identify the current best evidence from qualitative, quantitative, and mixed‐methods studies on healthcare leaders’ digital competence experiences and perceptions and factors associated with it. Methods. A mixed‐methods systematic review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines for mixed‐methods systematic reviews by including original qualitative and quantitative observational studies and mixed‐methods studies published in English or Finnish between January 2012 and January 2024. The studies were retrieved from four databases (CINAHL, PubMed, Scopus, and Medic). In total, 4470 articles were screened, 122 were eligible for full‐text screening, and 19 articles were included in the review according to the established inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data Extraction and Synthesis. Data tabulation and narrative synthesis for quantitative studies and content analysis for qualitative studies. Results. The synthesis of qualitative data identified five main categories that describe healthcare leaders’ experiences with digital competencies: (1) the need for developing leader’s own, professionals’, and patients’ competence in the digitalisation of healthcare, (2) the need for expertise in the health IT implementation process, (3) positive perceptions towards technology, (4) negative perceptions towards technology, and (5) ability to act as an advocate to implement technology into practice. Data from the selected quantitative studies presents that factors associated with the digital competence of healthcare leaders include individual characteristics, career characteristics, training, and other factors. Conclusion. This review suggests that developing and supporting healthcare leaders’ digital competencies should be considered in healthcare organizations, research, and education to make their digital competencies meet the demands of increasingly digitalising healthcare development work.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference73 articles.

1. LehtoaroS. JuujärviS. andSinervoT. Sähköiset palvelut ja palvelujen integraatio haastavat osaamisen: sote-ammattilaisten näkemyksiä tulevaisuuden osaamistarpeista. Tutkimuksesta tiiviisti. Terveyden ja hyvinvoinnin laitos 2019 https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-343-266-6.

2. Perspectives of nurse managers on information communication technology and e‐Leadership

3. A systematic review of informatics competencies: requirements for nurse managers in healthcare organisations

4. Perusterveydenhuollon johtajien kokemuksia koronaviruspandemian vaikutuksista digitaaliseen työkulttuuriin ja sen johtamiseen

5. How to Support the Nursing Informatics Leadership Pipeline

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3