Affiliation:
1. School of Social Work, University of Windsor, 167 Ferry Street, Windsor, Ontario, N9A0C5, Canada
2. University of Windsor, Ontario, Canada
3. Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
Abstract
Background. The dominant view in the literature is that informal payments in healthcare universally are a negative phenomenon. By contrast, we theorize that the motivation healthcare users for making informal payments (IP) can be classified into three categories: (1) a cultural norm, (2) “grease the wheels” payments if users offered to pay to get better services, and (3) “sand the wheels” payments if users were asked to pay by healthcare personnel or felt that payments were expected. We further hypothesize that these three categories of payments are differently associated with a user’s outcomes, namely, satisfaction with healthcare, local and national government, satisfaction with life, and satisfaction with life of children in the future. Methods. We used microdata from the 2016 Life-in-Transition survey. Multivariate regression analysis is used to quantify relationships between these categories of payments and users’ outcomes. Results. Payments that are the result of cultural norms are associated with better outcomes. On the contrary, “sand the wheel” payments are associated with worse outcomes. We find no association between making “grease the wheels” payments and outcomes. Conclusions. This is the first paper which evaluates association between three different categories of informal payments with a wide range of users’ outcomes on a diverse sample of countries. Focusing on informal payments in general, rather than explicitly examining specific motivations, obscures the true outcomes of making IP. It is important to distinguish between three different motivations for informal payment, namely, cultural norms, “grease the wheels,” and “sand the wheels” since they have varying associations with user outcomes. From a policy making standpoint, variation in the links between different motivations for making IP and measures of satisfaction suggest that decision-makers should put their primary focus on situations where IP are explicitly asked for or are implied by the situation and that they should differentiate this from cases of gratitude payments. If such measures are not implemented, then policy makers may unintentionally ban the behaviour that is linked with increased satisfaction with healthcare, government, and life (i.e., paying gratitude).
Subject
General Immunology and Microbiology,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Medicine
Reference66 articles.
1. Gift, fee, or bribe? Informal payments in Hungary;P. Gaal,2006
2. Defining informal payments in healthcare: A systematic review
3. Factors affecting informal patient payments: a systematic literature review
4. WHOOut-of-pocket payments, user fees and catastrophic expenditure2020World Health Organizationshttp://who.int/health_financing/topics/financial-protection/out-of-pocket-payments/en/
5. Informal payments and bought and brought goods in the Western Balkans-a scoping review;S. B. Mejsner;International Journal of Health Services,2017
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献