Prognostic Significance of Bone Metastasis in Soft Tissue Sarcoma Patients Receiving Palliative Systemic Therapy: An Explorative, Retrospective Pooled Analysis of the EORTC-Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group (STBSG) Database

Author:

Kantidakis Georgios1ORCID,Litière Saskia1ORCID,Gelderblom Hans2ORCID,Fiocco Marta3ORCID,Judson Ian4ORCID,van der Graaf Winette T.A.56ORCID,Italiano Antoine7,Marréaud Sandrine1ORCID,Sleijfer Stefan6ORCID,Mechtersheimer Gunhild8,Messiou Christina9ORCID,Kasper Bernd10ORCID

Affiliation:

1. EORTC Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium

2. Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands

3. Mathematical Institute Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands

4. Division of Clinical Studies, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK

5. Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands

6. Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands

7. Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France

8. Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

9. Department of Radiology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK

10. Sarcoma Unit, Mannheim University Medical Center, Mannheim Cancer Center (MCC), University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany

Abstract

Background. Soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) constitute a rare group of heterogeneous mesenchymal tumours containing more than 100 histologic subtypes. Here, we investigate whether, and if so, to what extent, skeletal metastases affect the outcome of patients with advanced or metastatic disease. Materials and Methods. Selected patients participated in five clinical trials of EORTC-STBSG. Individuals were included if they started treatment with an active drug and had advanced/metastatic STS. The endpoints of interest were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Univariate and multivariate pooled analyses (after correcting for 12 covariates) were employed with Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression to model the impact of bone metastasis at presentation per treatment line stratified by study. For the subset of patients with bone metastasis, the impact of another metastatic organ site was explored with multivariate Cox regression models. Results. 565 out of 1034 (54.6%) patients received first-line systemic treatment for locally advanced or metastatic disease. Bone metastases were present in 140 patients (77 first-line, 63 second-line or higher). The unadjusted difference in OS/PFS with or without bone metastasis was statistically significant only for first-line patients. For OS, the adjusted hazard ratios for bone metastasis presence were 1.33 (95%-CI: 0.99–1.78) and 1.11 (95%-CI: 0.81–1.52) for first-line/second-line or higher treated patients, respectively. Likewise, the adjusted hazard ratios for PFS were 1.31 (95%-CI: 1.00–1.73) and 1.07 (95%-CI: 0.80–1.43). Effects were not statistically significant, despite a trend in first-line patients for both endpoints. Subgroup analyses indicated bone and lymph node metastasis as the most detrimental combination for OS and bone and lung metastasis for PFS. Conclusions. Adult STS patients receiving palliative systemic therapy with bone metastasis carried an overall worse prognosis than STS patients without bone metastases. Skeletal metastasis was detrimental for both OS and PFS, independent of the treatment line. Findings may have implications for the management of these patients.

Funder

European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Oncology

Reference32 articles.

1. Soft‐tissue sarcoma in adults: An update on the current state of histiotype‐specific management in an era of personalized medicine

2. The 2020 WHO Classification

3. Metastatic soft tissue sarcomas: a review of treatment and new pharmacotherapies;E. K. Singhi;P and T: A Peer-Reviewed Journal for Formulary Management,2018

4. Treatment of advanced, metastatic soft tissue sarcoma: latest evidence and clinical considerations;G. K. In;Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology,2017

5. Soft tissue and visceral sarcomas: ESMO–EURACAN–GENTURIS clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up;A. Gronchi;Annals of Oncology,2021

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3