A Computational Intelligence Model for Legal Prediction and Decision Support

Author:

Shang Xuerui1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Law, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai, 200433, China

Abstract

Legal judgment prediction (LJP) and decision support aim to enable machines to predict the verdict of legal cases after reading the description of facts, which is an application of artificial intelligence in the legal field. This paper proposes a legal judgment prediction model based on process supervision for the sequential dependence of each subtask in the legal judgment prediction task. Experimental results verify the effectiveness of the model framework and process monitoring mechanism adopted in this model. First, the convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm was used to extract text features, and the principal component analysis (PCA) algorithm was used to reduce the dimension of data features. Next, the prediction model based on process supervision is proposed for the first time. When modeling the dependency relationship between sequential sub-data sets, process supervision is introduced to ensure the accuracy of the obtained dependency information, and genetic algorithm (GA) is introduced to optimize the parameters so as to improve the final prediction performance. Compared to our benchmark method, our algorithm achieved the best results on four different legal open data sets (CAIL2018_Small, CAIL2018_Large, CAIL2019_Small, and CAIL2019_Large). The realization of automatic prediction of legal judgment can not only assist judges, lawyers, and other professionals to make more efficient legal judgment but also provide legal aid for people who lack legal expertise.

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

General Mathematics,General Medicine,General Neuroscience,General Computer Science

Reference41 articles.

1. Predicting Supreme Court Decisions Mathematically: A Quantitative Analysis of the “Right to Counsel” Cases

2. Applying correlation analysis to case prediction;S. S. . Nagel;Tex.l.rev,1964

3. Mathematical models for legal prediction;R. Keown;Computer Journal,1980

4. Predicting Supreme Court Cases Probabilistically: The Search and Seizure Cases, 1962-1981

5. The Supreme Court's Many Median Justices

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Exploring the Power of AI-Driven Decision Making in the Judicial Domain;Advances in Media, Entertainment, and the Arts;2024-01-10

2. Scenario based Deep Learning Prediction for Legal Judgment using LSTM and CNN;2023 Third International Conference on Smart Technologies, Communication and Robotics (STCR);2023-12-09

3. Mining and Injecting Legal Prior Knowledge to Improve the Generalization Ability of Neural Networks in Chinese Judgments;Artificial Neural Networks and Machine Learning – ICANN 2023;2023

4. Design and Application of Land Resource Management System Based on Internet of Things;Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing;2022-08-11

5. Study of Deep Learning-Based Legal Judgment Prediction in Internet of Things Era;Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience;2022-08-08

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3