Affiliation:
1. Department of Transport & Planning, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, P.O. Box 5048, Delft 2600 GA, Netherlands
2. Goudappel BV, Public Transport & Self-driving Vehicles, Research & Behaviour, Anna van Buerenplein 46, The Hague 2595 DA, Netherlands
Abstract
In this paper, we study the deployment potential of automated minibuses (AmBs) on the first-mile part of public transport (PT) trips or short (sub)urban commutes by comparing “regular” (fixed route and fixed schedule) and “flexible” (door-to-door and on-demand) service types. For reaching that goal, we run a stated choice experiment in the Netherlands. The participants have assessed the referred two AmB alternatives compared to their current travel mode (car, PT, or active modes (AM) – bicycle and walking) used as the main mode for unimodal travellers or as access travel mode to transit lines for multimodal travellers. The results of a joint mixed logit model estimation based on data obtained from Dutch travellers show that there are similarities and differences in the preferences for the AmBs service type within and between the segments of travellers (car, PT, and AM) and that these are mostly in instrumental variables (cost and time) and attitudes. Current PT users prefer the flexible service to regular service based on their perception of in-vehicle travel time and waiting time, while current users of car and AM do not show a difference in preference between the two services concerning these variables. Moreover, their perception of in-vehicle travel time and waiting time is not significantly different from PT users’ perception of those variables in the regular service. This may mean that for non-PT users (car and AM), AmB’s flexibility of door-to-door transport is not seen as offering a significant advantage over what they think about public transport. When looking at the preferences of potential users explained by underlying psychological factors, we conclude that a positive attitude towards riding in AmBs is a significant factor in all three segments of travellers. Trust, usefulness, and enjoyment in using AmBs are important prerequisites for car and PT users to choose either service type. The experience with technology positively influences the preferences of current PT users for both AmB services.
Funder
Delft University of Technology
Subject
Strategy and Management,Computer Science Applications,Mechanical Engineering,Economics and Econometrics,Automotive Engineering
Reference77 articles.
1. The role of micro-mobility in shaping sustainable cities: A systematic literature review
2. Sharing strategies: carsharing, shared micromobility (bikesharing and scooter sharing), transportation network companies, microtransit, and other innovative mobility modes;S. Shaheen;Transportation,,2020
3. Driverless mobility: the impact on metropolitan spatial structures;P. M. Smolnicki;Procedia Engineering,2016
4. Electric carsharing and micromobility: A literature review on their usage pattern, demand, and potential impacts
5. HagenziekerM.BoersmaR.Nuñez VelascoJ. P.ÖztürkerM.ZubinI.HeikoopD.Automated buses in Europe: an inventory of pilots (Final version of report)2021NetherlandDelft University of TechnologyDelft University of Technology, Netherland, 2021, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356604869_Hagenzieker_et_al_2021_Automated_Buses_in_Europe_An_Inventory_of_Pilots_-_Final_Report
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献