A Discrete Choice Experiment of Older Self-Funders’ Preferences When Navigating Community Social Care

Author:

Jasper Rowan1ORCID,Wright Stuart2,Rogers Stephen3,Tonks Sarah4,Morfitt Richard4,Baxter Kate1,Birks Yvonne1,Wilberforce Mark1

Affiliation:

1. School for Business and Society, University of York, Heslington, UK

2. Manchester Centre for Health Economics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

3. Consultant Independent Researcher, York, UK

4. Consultant Independent Researcher, Hull, UK

Abstract

Most long-term care systems (social care) for older people rely on some means testing, copayment system, private insurance, or other non-governmental funding to supplement state provision. In England, an estimated quarter of homecare delivery is funded privately. For many older people, the absence of state funding for their care is only part of the problem: they are also expected to search for care in a market characterised by complexity, plurality, and imperfect information. Surprisingly, there are few services available to support private funders to navigate the system. This paper examines willingness to pay for care navigation and seeks to classify heterogeneity of preferences for navigation support. A discrete choice experiment (DCE) survey was completed by 182 participants across England in 2020-21. The results of the random parameter logit model used to analyse preferences showed that people valued information about care options (quality, information, and finances), but they also wanted help to “think things through,” as processing information could be challenging. Generally, participants valued what the navigation service provided, more than how the services were organised and delivered. The study also used latent class analysis to identify four groups with similar preferences, with almost half of participants (48%) expressing high willingness to pay for a comprehensive navigation service. The other three classes represented those with preferences focused on a narrower set of attributes: fast access to information (20%), affordable help to “think things through” (18%), and information provided by their local council (14%). The study demonstrates the potential demand and likely take-up of navigation support if made available to people who pay privately for care. Future research needs to examine the barriers to market development for social care navigation services.

Funder

National Institute of Health and Care Research School for Social Care Research

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,Sociology and Political Science,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Reference42 articles.

1. Sustainability of Long-term Care: Puzzling Tasks Ahead for Policy-Makers

2. Long-Term Care Financing: Lessons From France

3. Displaced, disliked and misunderstood: A systematic review of the reasons for low uptake of long-term care insurance and life annuities

4. HenwoodM.McKayS.NeedhamC.GlasbyJ.From bystanders to core participants? A literature and data review of self-funders in social care markets2019England, UKUniversity of Birmingham: Health Services Management CentreInterim Report

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3