Accuracy and Safety of Robot-Assisted versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Posterior C1 Lateral Mass and C2 Pedicle Screw Internal Fixation for Atlantoaxial Dislocation: A Preliminary Study

Author:

Zhan Jiheng1234ORCID,Xu Wenke135ORCID,Lin Jinhao5ORCID,Luan Jiyao45ORCID,Hou Yu135ORCID,Wang Yufeng1ORCID,Li Yongjin1ORCID,Chen Bolai1ORCID,Lin Dingkun13ORCID,Chen Shudong13ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of orthopedics, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510120, China

2. Postdoctoral Workstation, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510120, China

3. Research Team on the Prevention and Treatment of Spinal Degenerative Disease, Guangdong Provincial Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Guangzhou 510006, China

4. Postdoctoral Research Station, Chinese Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China

5. Second Clinical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, China

Abstract

Objective. To compare the accuracy, efficiency, and safety of robotic assistance (RA) and conventional fluoroscopy guidance for the placement of C1 lateral mass and C2 pedicle screws in posterior atlantoaxial fusion. Methods. The data of patients who underwent posterior C1–C2 screw fixation (Goel-Harm’s technique) in our hospital from August 2014 to March 2021 were retrospectively evaluated, including 14 cases under fluoroscopic guidance and 11 cases under RA. The hospital records, radiographic results, surgical data, and follow-up records were reviewed. Accuracy of screw placement was assessed using the Gertzbein and Robbins scale, and clinical outcomes were evaluated by Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, visual analogue scale (VAS), modified MacNab criteria, and postoperative complications. Results. Baseline characteristics of both groups were similar. The mean estimated blood loss in the fluoroscopic guidance and RA groups was 205.7 ± 80.3 mL and 120.9 ± 31.9 mL , respectively ( p = 0.03 ). The mean surgical duration was 34 min longer with RA compared to that performed with free-hand (FH) method ( p = 0.15 ). In addition, lower intraoperative radiation exposure was detected in the RA group ( 12.4 ± 1.4  mGy/screw) versus the FH ( 19.9 ± 2.1  mGy/screw) group ( p = 0.01 ). The proportion of “clinically acceptable” screws (graded 0 and I) was higher in the RA group (93.2%) than that in the FH group (87.5%, p = 0.04 ). There was no significant difference in the increase of JOA score and decrease of VAS score between the two surgical procedures. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in overall clinical outcome between the two groups and no neurovascular complications associated with screw insertion. Conclusions. RA is a safe and potentially more accurate alternative to the conventional fluoroscopic-guided FH technique for posterior atlantoaxial internal fixation.

Funder

Special Research Project of TCM Science and Technology of Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

General Immunology and Microbiology,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3