Clinical Efficacy of Mechanical Traction as Physical Therapy for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Meta-Analysis

Author:

Wang Wenxian1,Long Feibing2,Wu Xinshun2,Li Shanhuan2,Lin Ji3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Spinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, 570102 Hainan, China

2. Department of Surgery, Hainan Cancer Hospital, Haikou, 570100 Hainan, China

3. Department of Orthopedics, Wenchang City People’s Hospital, Wenchang, 571300 Hainan, China

Abstract

Objective. This study is aimed at exploring the clinical effect of mechanical traction on lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Methods. Related literatures were retrieved from PubMed, Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, and CNKI databases. Inclusion of literature topic was comparison of mechanical traction and conventional physical therapy for lumbar disc herniation. Jadad scale was used to evaluate the quality of the included RCT studies. The Chi-square test was used for the heterogeneity test, and a random effect model was used with heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were used to explore the causes of heterogeneity. If there was no heterogeneity, the fixed effect model was used, and funnel plots were used to test publication bias. Results. Visual analog scale (VAS) in the mechanical traction group was lower than that in the conventional physical therapy group ( MD = 1.39 (95% CI (-1.81, -0.98)), Z = 6.56 , and P < 0.00001 ). There was no heterogeneity among studies ( Ch i 2 = 6.62 , P = 0.25 , and I 2 = 24 %) and no publication bias. Oswestry disability index (ODI) in the mechanical traction group was lower than that in the conventional physical therapy group ( MD = 6.34 (95% CI (-10.28, -2.39)), Z = 3.15 , and P = 0.002 ). There was no heterogeneity between studies ( Ch i 2 = 6.27 , P = 0.18 , and I 2 = 36 %) and no publication bias. There was no significant difference in Schober test scores between the mechanical traction group and the conventional physical therapy group ( MD = 0.40 (95% CI (-1.07, 0.28)), Z = 1.16 , and P = 0.25 ). There was no heterogeneity among studies ( Ch i 2 = 1.61 , P = 0.66 , and I 2 = 0 %) and no publication bias. Conclusion. Mechanical traction can effectively relieve lumbar and leg pain and improve ODI in patients with lumbar disc herniation but has no significant effect on spinal motion. The therapeutic effect of mechanical traction was significantly better than that of conventional physical therapy. Lumbar traction can be used in conjunction with other traditional physical therapy.

Funder

Hainan Province Clinical Medical Center

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

Applied Mathematics,General Immunology and Microbiology,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,Modeling and Simulation,General Medicine

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3