In Vitro Effect of the Length of Relocated Cervical Margin with Casting Post and Core, Prefabricated Fiber Post, and Polyethylene Fiber with a Composite Core on Fracture Resistance and Marginal Integrity

Abstract

Objective. This study aimed to assess the effect of length of the relocated cervical margin with casting post and core (CP), prefabricated fiber post and composite core (PFP), and polyethylene fiber‐reinforced composite (PEFRC) on fracture resistance and marginal integrity. Materials and Methods. In this in vitro study, 70 sound human maxillary premolars were divided into seven groups according to the type of post and core system and length of the relocated cervical margin (n = 10): control (no preparation), PFP‐3, PEFRC‐3, CP‐3 with 3 mm of cervical margin relocation (CMR), PFP‐6, PEFRC‐6, and CP‐6 (with 6 mm of CMR). The samples were restored with zirconia crowns (except the control group). Epoxy resin replicas were fabricated before and after thermomechanical loading. Marginal integrity was assessed at the luting cement‐core, core‐tooth, and luting cement‐enamel interfaces under a scanning electron microscope (SEM) (×200). Fracture resistance and failure mode were subsequently assessed. Data were analyzed by independent t‐test, paired t‐test, ANOVA, Tukey–Games Howell, Mann–Whitney, Kruskal–Wallis, Wilcoxon, Mann–Whitney with Bonferroni correction, and Fisher–Freeman–Halton tests (α = 0.05). Results. The marginal integrity of the groups with 3 mm of CMR followed the following order: PEFRC > PFP > CP at all interfaces (P  < 0.05). In 6‐mm CMR groups, this order was CP < PFP = PEFRC at the luting cement‐core and (CP < PEFRC) = PFP at the core‐tooth interface. No significant difference was found in fracture resistance when comparing the 3‐mm CMR groups with each other (P  > 0.05). PFP‐6 showed higher FR than CP‐6 (P  < 0.001). PEFRC‐6 had no significant difference with PFP‐6 and CP‐6 (P  > 0.05). In each post and core system, 3‐mm CMR groups showed higher marginal integrity and fracture resistance (P  < 0.05). Conclusion. Increasing the length of the relocated cervical margin decreased the marginal integrity and fracture resistance of all three systems of CP, PFP, and PEFRC.