Basal and Bolus Insulin Distribution According to Treatment Modality: Data from SWEET Diabetes Registry

Author:

Evin Ferda1ORCID,Tittel Sascha R.23ORCID,Piccini Barbara4ORCID,Cardona-Hernandez Roque5ORCID,Mul Dick6ORCID,Sheanon Nicole7ORCID,von dem Berge Thekla8ORCID,Neuman Vit9ORCID,Tauschmann Martin10ORCID,Gökşen Damla1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey

2. Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Central Institute for Biomedical Technology (ZIBMT), Ulm University, Ulm, Germany

3. German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), Munich, Neuherberg, Germany

4. Diabetology Unit, Meyer University Children’s Hospital IRCCS, Florence, Italy

5. Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain

6. Diabeter, Center for Pediatric and Adult Diabetes Care and Research, Rotterdam, Netherlands

7. Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA

8. Kinder und Jugendkrankenhaus AUF DER BULT, Diabetes Center for Children and Adolescents, Hannover, Germany

9. Department of Pediatrics, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic

10. Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

Abstract

Background and Aims. The optimal basal and bolus insulin distribution in type 1 diabetes (T1D) is still controversial. Herein, we aimed to determine the variability of basal to total daily insulin dose according to treatment modality and diabetes technologies from the Better Control in Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes: Working to Create Centers of Reference (SWEET) registry. Methods. The study cohort was generated by using the SWEET database. Patients with T1D for at least 2 years, aged between 2.5 and 18 years, with at least one clinic visit between June 2010 and June 2021, were included in the study. Four groups were composed according to treatment modality as follows: multiple daily injections (MDI) without continuous glucose monitoring (CGM); MDI with CGM; subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) without CGM; and CSII with CGM. Data of the participants were analyzed and compared for each treatment modality separately. Results. A total of 38,956 children and adolescents were included in the study. Of the study sample, 48.6% were female, the median (range) age was 15.2 (11.9–17.2) years, and the median diabetes duration was 6.0 (3.8–9.0) years. The distribution of treatment modality was as follows: MDI without CGM, 32.9%; MDI with CGM, 18.0%; CSII without CGM, 11.7%; and CSII with CGM, 37.3%. In unadjusted data, regardless of treatment modality, all the analyses revealed a significant association between basal dose to total daily insulin dose (BD/TDD) with male gender, younger age group, and lower HbA1c, which were all related to a decreased ratio of BD/TDD (all p < 0.05 ). There was no association between BD/TDD and different diabetes technologies after the age, gender, and diabetes duration were adjusted. Conclusions. Herein, we showed that there was an association between lower proportions of basal to total insulin and lower hemoglobin A1c in a large cross-sectional cohort of children who had T1D. There was also an association between lower BD/TDD and younger age. There was no significant difference between BD/TDD ratios under different diabetes technologies (CGM and/or CSII).

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health,Internal Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3