Comparison of Efficacy and Psychology of Breast-Conserving Surgery and Modified Radical Mastectomy on Patients with Early Breast Cancer under Graded Nursing

Abstract

Objective. To compare the efficacy and psychology of breast-conserving surgery and modified radical mastectomy in patients with early breast cancer (BC) under graded nursing. Methods. Forty-one early breast-conserving surgery BC patients admitted to our hospital from April 2020 to March 2022 were regarded as group A, and 52 with modified radical surgery were seen as group B. The operating time, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative drainage, and hospital stay were compared, and the postoperative adverse effects were counted. In addition, patients’ psychology and quality of life were assessed using the HAMD, HAMA, and QLSBC rating scales. At the time of discharge, a treatment satisfaction survey was conducted. Results. The operative time, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative drainage, and hospital stay of patients in group A were lower than those in group B ( $P<0.05$ ). After treatment, the HAMD and HAMA scores were lower in group A than in group B, while the QLSBC scores and treatment satisfaction were higher ( $P<0.05$ ). Conclusion. Breast-conserving surgery under graded nursing is less damaging to early BC patients. It can effectively shorten the postoperative recovery process and improve the psychology and quality of life, so it has higher clinical applicability.