Comparison of Corneal Biomechanical Properties between Post-LASIK Ectasia and Primary Keratoconus

Author:

Zhao Wuxiao123,Shen Yang123,Jian Weijun123,Shang Jianmin123,Jhanji Vishal4,Aruma Aruma123,Zhou Xingtao123ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

2. NHC Key Laboratory of Myopia, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

3. Shanghai Research Center of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Shanghai, China

4. UPMC Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

Abstract

Purpose. To compare the corneal biomechanical properties between post-LASIK ectasia and primary keratoconus. Methods. A total of 42 eyes of 42 patients with matching age and central corneal thickness (CCT) were divided into two groups according to diagnosis of post-LASIK ectasia (PLE group; n = 21; age range: 22–47 years) and primary keratoconus (KC group; n = 21; age range: 21–47 years). The corneal biomechanical properties were assessed using Scheimpflug-based technology (Corvis ST; Oculus Optikgeräte, Wetzlar, Germany). The paired t-test and linear regression analysis were performed. Results. The PLE group had significantly higher mean stiffness parameter at the first applanation (SP-A1; 76.65 ± 21.66 vs 52.72 ± 13.65, p 0.001 ) and mean stress-strain index (SSI) (SSI: 0.78 ± 0.16 versus 0.64 ± 0.12, p = 0.001 ) than the KC group. SP-A1 was positively correlated with CCT in the PLE group (Pearson’s r = 0.816, p 0.001 ), but not in the KC group (Pearson’s r = −0.014, p = 0.952 ). No statistical correlation was observed between SSI and CCT in either group (Pearson’s r = 0.292, p = 0.199 , and Pearson’s r = 0.004, p = 0.985 , respectively). Conclusions. In our case series, KC manifested more severe than PLE in biomechanical properties. Since SSI measurements were independent of corneal thickness, it can be used for corneal biomechanical assessment.

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

Ophthalmology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3