Prognostic Impact of Prephase Treatment Prior to First-Line Treatment in DLBCL: A Population-Based Registry Study

Author:

Levy Anthony12,Defossez Gautier34,Delwail Vincent14,Guidez Stéphanie14,Chaubard Sammara5,Nunes Gomes Christopher6,Cailly Laura1,Letailleur Valentin7,Machet Antoine8,Leleu Xavier14,Ingrand Pierre34,Systchenko Thomas134ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Haematology Department, CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France

2. Haematology Department, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France

3. Poitou-Charentes General Cancer Registry, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France

4. INSERM CIC 1402, CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France

5. Haematology Department, CHU de Limoges, Limoges, France

6. Haematology Department, CHU d’Angers, Angers, France

7. Haematology Department, CHU de Nantes, Nantes, France

8. Haematology Department, CHU de Tours, Tours, France

Abstract

Introduction. Prephase treatment (PP) is recommended in diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL) to decrease therapy-related toxicities and to avoid tumour lysis syndrome. Data in the real world are limited, and no study has evaluated the impact on overall survival. We aimed to evaluate overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and grade III-IV toxicities during the first cycle according to PP. Methods and Materials. All DLBCL diagnosed between 2014 and 2017 and aged between 18 and 80 years were identified by the Poitou-Charentes General Cancer Registry (France). PP was defined as any treatment prior to first-line, excluding anthracycline and/or Rituximab. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) to control characteristics at diagnosis, reduce bias, and approximate a randomized trial. Results. Three hundred and forty patients received first-line treatment in 17 hospital centers: 126 (37%) with prephase and 214 (63%) without prephase (NPP). After PSM, 97 patients remained in each group without significant difference in characteristics at diagnosis; matched PP patients had a 2-year OS of 71% (vs. 77%, P  = 0.32), a 2-year PFS of 61% (vs. 74%, P  = 0.12), and 26% grade III-IV toxicities (vs. 27%, P  = 0.75). No tumour lysis syndrome was reported. PP nonsignificantly decreases grade III-IV toxicities for patients with high tumour load ( P  = 0.82) or elderly patients ( P  = 0.81). Conclusion. PP treatment does not affect survival nor does it reduce therapy-related toxicities even for patients with high tumour load or elderly patients. Further studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PP.

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3