Searching for the Impact of Participation in Health and Health Research: Challenges and Methods

Author:

Harris Janet1ORCID,Cook Tina2,Gibbs Lisa3ORCID,Oetzel John4ORCID,Salsberg Jon5,Shinn Carolynne6,Springett Jane7,Wallerstein Nina8,Wright Michael9

Affiliation:

1. School of Health & Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S14DA, UK

2. Department of Disability and Education, Liverpool Hope University, Hope Park, Liverpool L16 9JD, UK

3. Centre for Health Equity, University of Melbourne, Level 5, 207 Bouverie Street, Carlton, VIC 3053, Australia

4. Waikato Management School, University of Waikato, Private Bag 3105, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand

5. Graduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick, Limerick V94 T9PX, Ireland

6. New Hampshire Division of Health and Human Services, 105 Pleasant Street, Concord, NH 03301, USA

7. School of Public Health, University of Alberta, 3-289 Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, 11405-87 Ave., Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2C9

8. College of Population Health, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA

9. Institute for Social Health, Catholic University of Applied Sciences Berlin, Kopenicker Allee 39-57, 10318 Berlin, Germany

Abstract

Internationally, the interest in involving patients and the public in designing and delivering health interventions and researching their effectiveness is increasing. Several systematic reviews of participation in health research have recently been completed, which note a number of challenges in documenting the impact of participation. Challenges include working across stakeholders with different understandings of participation and levels of experience in reviewing; comparing heterogeneous populations and contexts; configuring findings from often thin descriptions of participation in academic papers; and dealing with different definitions of impact. This paper aims to advance methods for systematically reviewing the impact of participation in health research, drawing on recent systematic review guidance. Practical examples for dealing with issues at each stage of a review are provided based on recent experience. Recommendations for improving primary research on participation in health are offered and key points to consider during the review are summarised.

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

General Immunology and Microbiology,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3