Affiliation:
1. Assistive Technology and Medical Devices Research Center, National Science and Technology Development Agency, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand
2. Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand
Abstract
Background. The National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA) in Thailand researched and prototyped digital radiography systems under the brand name BodiiRay aiming for sustainable development and affordability of medical imaging technology. The image restoration and enhancement were implemented for the systems. Purpose. The image quality of the systems was evaluated using images from phantoms and from healthy volunteers. Methods. The survey phantom images from BodiiRay and other two commercial systems using the exposure settings for the chest, the abdomen, and the extremity were evaluated by three experience observers in terms of the high-contrast image resolution, the low-contrast image detectability, and the grayscale differentiation. The volunteer images of the chests, the abdomens, and the extremities from BodiiRay were evaluated by three specialized radiologists based on visual grading on 5-point scaled questionnaires for the anatomy visibility, the image quality satisfaction, and the diagnosis confidence in using the images. Results. BodiiRay phantom results were similar to those from the commercial systems. The overall performance averaged across the exposure settings showed that BodiiRay was slightly better than Fujifilm FDR Go in the low-contrast detectability (
) and in the grayscale differentiation (
). It was also slightly better than Siemens YSIO Max in the high-contrast resolution (
). The images of chest, pelvis, and hand phantoms illustrated comparable visual quality. For volunteer images, the percentage of the images scored ≥4 ranged from 61% to 99%, 23% to 92%, and 96% to 99% for the chest, abdomen, and extremity images, respectively. The average score ranged from 3.63 to 4.46, 3.18 to 4.21, and 4.41 to 4.51 for the chest, abdomen, and extremity images, respectively. Conclusion. The phantom image results showed the comparability of these systems. The clinical evaluation showed BodiiRay images provided sufficient image qualities for digital radiography of these body parts.
Funder
National Science and Technology Development Agency
Subject
General Immunology and Microbiology,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Medicine
Reference21 articles.
1. Screen film processing systems for medical radiography: a historical review.
2. Comparison of eight different digital chest radiography systems: variation in detection of simulated chest disease;L. J. Kroft;American Journal of Roentgenology,2005
3. Advances in computed radiography systems and their physical imaging characteristics;A. R. Cowen;Clinical Radiology,2007
4. Image Quality Comparison and Clinical Evaluation for U-Arm Digital Radiography;K. Koonsanit;Science & Technology Asia,2020
5. Application of the ILO International Classification of Radiographs of Pneumoconioses to Digital Chest Radiographic Images;M. J. Flynn,2008
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献