Image Quality Evaluation of a Digital Radiography System Made in Thailand

Author:

Techavipoo Udomchai1ORCID,Sinsuebphon Nattawut1ORCID,Prompalit Sakunrat1ORCID,Thongvigitmanee Saowapak1ORCID,Narkbuakaew Walita1ORCID,Kiang-ia Atthasak1ORCID,Srivongsa Tanapon1ORCID,Thajchayapong Pairash1ORCID,Chaumrattanakul Utairat2

Affiliation:

1. Assistive Technology and Medical Devices Research Center, National Science and Technology Development Agency, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand

2. Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand

Abstract

Background. The National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA) in Thailand researched and prototyped digital radiography systems under the brand name BodiiRay aiming for sustainable development and affordability of medical imaging technology. The image restoration and enhancement were implemented for the systems. Purpose. The image quality of the systems was evaluated using images from phantoms and from healthy volunteers. Methods. The survey phantom images from BodiiRay and other two commercial systems using the exposure settings for the chest, the abdomen, and the extremity were evaluated by three experience observers in terms of the high-contrast image resolution, the low-contrast image detectability, and the grayscale differentiation. The volunteer images of the chests, the abdomens, and the extremities from BodiiRay were evaluated by three specialized radiologists based on visual grading on 5-point scaled questionnaires for the anatomy visibility, the image quality satisfaction, and the diagnosis confidence in using the images. Results. BodiiRay phantom results were similar to those from the commercial systems. The overall performance averaged across the exposure settings showed that BodiiRay was slightly better than Fujifilm FDR Go in the low-contrast detectability ( p = 0.033 ) and in the grayscale differentiation ( p = 0.004 ). It was also slightly better than Siemens YSIO Max in the high-contrast resolution ( p = 0.018 ). The images of chest, pelvis, and hand phantoms illustrated comparable visual quality. For volunteer images, the percentage of the images scored ≥4 ranged from 61% to 99%, 23% to 92%, and 96% to 99% for the chest, abdomen, and extremity images, respectively. The average score ranged from 3.63 to 4.46, 3.18 to 4.21, and 4.41 to 4.51 for the chest, abdomen, and extremity images, respectively. Conclusion. The phantom image results showed the comparability of these systems. The clinical evaluation showed BodiiRay images provided sufficient image qualities for digital radiography of these body parts.

Funder

National Science and Technology Development Agency

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

General Immunology and Microbiology,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Medicine

Reference21 articles.

1. Screen film processing systems for medical radiography: a historical review.

2. Comparison of eight different digital chest radiography systems: variation in detection of simulated chest disease;L. J. Kroft;American Journal of Roentgenology,2005

3. Advances in computed radiography systems and their physical imaging characteristics;A. R. Cowen;Clinical Radiology,2007

4. Image Quality Comparison and Clinical Evaluation for U-Arm Digital Radiography;K. Koonsanit;Science & Technology Asia,2020

5. Application of the ILO International Classification of Radiographs of Pneumoconioses to Digital Chest Radiographic Images;M. J. Flynn,2008

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3