Hyperfractionation versus Conventional Fractionation of Preoperative Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy with Oral Capecitabine in Locally Advanced Mid-Low Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Study

Author:

Shi Chen1ORCID,Zhang Yangzi1ORCID,Li Yongheng1ORCID,Geng Jianhao1,Zhu Xianggao1,Wang Hongzhi1,Cai Yong1ORCID,Wang Weihu1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, China

Abstract

Purpose. In theory, the hyperfractionated radiotherapy can enhance biological effect dose against tumor and alleviate normal tissue toxicity. This study is to assess the efficacy and safety of preoperative hyperfractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with oral capecitabine in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Methods. We retrospectively screened patients with LARC from January 2015 to June 2016. Patients that received hyperfractionated IMRT or conventional fractionated IMRT were eligible in the hyperfractionation (HF) group or conventional fractionation (CF) group, respectively. The primary outcome was the complete response rate. Secondary outcomes included toxicity, postoperative complications, anus-reservation operation rate, local recurrence and distant metastases rate, overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Results. 335 patients were included in the analysis. The complete response rate for the hyperfractionated and conventional fractionated IMRT was 20.41% vs. 23.47% ( P = 0.583 ). The anus-reservation operation rate was 68.37% vs. 65.31% ( P = 0.649 ). There were no cases of grade 4 toxicity during radiotherapy; the rate of grade 3 toxicity and postoperative complications was both comparable between groups. However, in the CF group, more patients had a second operation due to complications (0.0% vs. 5.68%, P = 0.011 ). The cumulative local regional recurrence and distant metastases rates of the HF group and CF group were 5.10% vs. 9.18% ( P = 0.267 ) and 22.45% vs. 24.49% ( P = 0.736 ), respectively. The 5-year OS, CSS, and DFS in the HF group and CF group were 86.45% vs. 73.30% ( P = 0.503 ), 87.34% vs. 75.23% ( P = 0.634 ), and 70.80% vs. 68.11% ( P = 0.891 ), respectively. Conclusions. The preoperative hyperfractionated IMRT with oral capecitabine, with an acceptable toxicity and favorable response and survival, could reduce the rate of secondary surgery.

Funder

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3