Comparison and Clinical Value of Ciprofol and Propofol in Intraoperative Adverse Reactions, Operation, Resuscitation, and Satisfaction of Patients under Painless Gastroenteroscopy Anesthesia

Author:

Chen Xingqu1,Guo Ping2,Yang Li1,Liu Zhuoling1,Yu Deshui1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. The Second People’s Hospital of Yibin, Department of Anesthesiology, Yibin, China

2. Department of Critical Care Medicine, The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Nuclear Industry 416 Hospital, Chengdu 610051, Sichuan Province, China

Abstract

Objective. To investigate the comparison and clinical value of ciprofol and propofol for painless gastroenteroscopy anesthesia in terms of intraoperative adverse reactions, operation, resuscitation, and satisfaction of patients. Methods. A total of 96 patients who underwent painless gastroenteroscopy anesthesia in our hospital from June 2021 to January 2022 were enrolled. The cases were randomly assigned into research group and control group. The control group received propofol anesthesia (n = 49), and the research group received ciprofol anesthesia (n = 47). The patients, physician satisfaction, vital signs, incidence of adverse reactions, anesthetic first dose, additional time, additional dose, total dose, induction time, insertion time, operation time, awake time, orientation recovery time, leaving room time, and injection pain score were compared. Results. The overall satisfaction of the study group was higher than that of the control group ( p  < 0.05). After taking medicine, the score of 1 min and MAP in the study group were higher than those in the control group. The incidence of adverse reactions in the study group was lower than that in the control group ( p  < 0.05). The satisfaction of doctors in the study group was higher than that in the control group ( p  < 0.05). The anesthesia induction time, intubation time, operation time, awake time, orientation recovery time, and leaving room time in the study group were significantly longer than those in the control group ( p  < 0.05). The incidence and degree of injection pain in the propofol group were significantly lower than those in the propofol group ( p  < 0.05). Conclusion. In painless gastroenteroscopy, compared with propofol, ciprofol is equally safe and effective for patients and will not cause early cognitive dysfunction after operation, which is a good choice in painless gastroenteroscopy anesthesia. In addition, ciprofol has significant advantages in patient and physician satisfaction, especially in injection pain. This trial is registered with ChiCTR2100045400.

Funder

Beijing Kangmeng Charitable Foundation

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3