Five-Year Predictors of Insulin Initiation in People with Type 2 Diabetes under Real-Life Conditions

Author:

Gentile Sandro1,Strollo Felice2ORCID,Viazzi Francesca3ORCID,Russo Giuseppina4ORCID,Piscitelli Pamela5,Ceriello Antonio67ORCID,Giorda Carlo8,Guida Piero9,Fioretto Paola10,Pontremoli Roberto3ORCID,De Cosmo Salvatore5ORCID,the AMD-Annals Study Group 11

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy

2. Diabetes Center, San Raffaele Termini, Rome, Italy

3. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa and Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy

4. Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy

5. IRCSS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza-Unit of Internal Medicine, Scientific Institute, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy

6. Institut d’Investigacions Biomédiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Centro de Investigación Biomedica en Red de Diabetes y Enfermedades Metabólicas Asociadas (CIBERDEM), Barcelona, Spain

7. Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases, IRCCS Multimedica, Milan, Italy

8. Diabetes and Metabolism Unit ASL Turin 5, Chieri, Italy

9. Statistical Consultant, Associazione Medici Diabetologi (AMD), Rome, Italy

10. Department of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy

11. Associazione Medici Diabetologi (AMD), Rome, Italy

Abstract

We performed a real-life analysis of clinical and laboratory parameters, in orally treated T2DM patients aiming at identifying predictors of insulin treatment initiation. Overall, 366955 patients (55.8% males, age 65 ± 11 years, diabetes duration 7 ± 8 years) were followed up between 2004 and 2011. Each patient was analyzed step-by-step until either eventually starting insulin treatment or getting to the end of the follow-up period. Patients switching to insulin showed a worse global risk profile, longer disease duration (10 ± 9 years vs. 6 ± 7 years, respectively;p<0.001), higher HbA1c (8.0 ± 1.6% vs. 7.2 ± 1.5%, respectively;p<0.001), higher triglycerides, a greater prevalence of arterial hypertension, antihypertensive, lipid-lowering and aspirin treatment, a higher rate of nonproliferative/proliferative retinopathy, and a nearly 4 times lower prevalence of the “diet alone.” They also showed a higher prevalence of subjects with eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2(24.0% vs. 16.2%, respectively;p<0.001). Multivariate analysis identified diabetes duration, HbA1c, triglyceride and low HDL-C values, presence of retinopathy or renal dysfunction, and sulphonylurea utilization (the risk being approximately 3 times greater in the latter case) as independent predictors of insulin treatment initiation. LDL-C, lipid-lowering treatment, and overweight/obese seem to be protective. Results of tree analysis showed that patients on sulphonylurea, with high HbA1c, eGFR below 50 ml/min/1.73 m2, and at least 5-year disease duration, are at very high risk to start insulin treatment. We have to stick to this real-life picture, of course, until enough data are collected on patients treated with innovative medications which are expected to improve beta cell survival and further delay treatment-related insulin requirement.

Funder

Italian Associazione Medici Diabetologi

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

Endocrinology,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3