COIN: Correlation Index-Based Similarity Measure for Clustering Categorical Data

Author:

Sowmiya N.1,Gupta N.Srinivasa2ORCID,Natarajan Elango3ORCID,Valarmathi B4ORCID,Elamvazuthi I.5ORCID,Parasuraman S.6ORCID,Kit Chun Ang3,Freitas Lídio Inácio7ORCID,Abraham Gnanamuthu Ezra Morris8ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Computer Science and Design, SNS College of Engineering, Coimbatore, India

2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Mechanical Engineering, VIT University, Vellore, India

3. Faculty of Engineering, Technology and Built Environment, UCSI University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

4. Department of Software and Systems Engineering, School of Information Technology and Engineering, VIT University, Vellore, India

5. Department of Electrical & Electronic Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Petronas, Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia

6. School of Engineering, Monash University Malaysia, Jalan Lagoon Selatan, Bandar Sunway 46150, Selangor, Malaysia

7. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Dili Institute of Technology, Dili, East Timor

8. Lee Kong Chian Faculty of Engineering and Science, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman (UTAR), Sungai Long, Malaysia

Abstract

In this paper, a correlation index-based clustering algorithm (COIN) is proposed for clustering the categorical data. The proposed algorithm was tested on nine datasets gathered from the University of California at Irvine (UCI) repository. The experiments were made in two ways, one by specifying the number of clusters and another without specifying the number of clusters. The proposed COIN algorithm is compared with five existing categorical clustering algorithms such as Mean Gain Ratio (MGR), Min–Min-Roughness (MMR), COOLCAT, K-ANMI, and G-ANMI. The result analysis clearly reports that COIN outperforms other algorithms. It produced better accuracies for eight datasets (88.89%) and slightly lower accuracy for one dataset (11%) when compared individually with MMR, K-ANMI, and MGR algorithms. It produced better accuracies for all nine datasets (100%) when it is compared with G-ANMI and COOLCAT algorithms. When COIN was executed without specifying the number of clusters, it outperformed MGR for 88.89% of the test instances and produced lower accuracy for 11% of the test instances.

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

General Engineering,General Mathematics

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3