Author:
Charteris Nicholas P.,Roth Bradley J.
Abstract
Researchers have suggested that the fate of a shock‐induced wave front at the
edge of a “virtual anode” (a region hyperpolarized by the shock) is a key factor determining success or failure during defibrillation of the heart. In this paper, we use a simple one‐dimensional computer model to examine propagation speed through a hyperpolarized region. Our goal is to test the hypothesis that rapid propagation through a virtual anode can cause failure of propagation at the edge of the virtual anode. The calculations support this hypothesis and suggest that the time constant of the sodium inactivation gate is an important parameter. These results may be significant in understanding the mechanism of the upper limit of vulnerability.
Reference31 articles.
1. Defibrillation Mechanisms:.
2. Le seuil de réponse synchrone des fibres myocardiques. Application à la comparaison expérimentale de l′efficacité des différentes formes de chocs électriques de défibrillation;Fabiato A.;Archives des Maladies du Coeur et des Vaisseaux,1967
3. Comparison of the defibrillation threshold and the upper limit of ventricular vulnerability.
4. Epicardial activation following unsuccessful defibrillation shocks in dogs;Shibata N.;American Journal of Physiology,1988
5. Activation during ventricular defibrillation in open-chest dogs. Evidence of complete cessation and regeneration of ventricular fibrillation after unsuccessful shocks.