The Cleveland Clinic Experience with Supraclavicular and Popliteal Ambulatory Nerve Catheters

Author:

Gharabawy Ramez1,Abd-Elsayed Alaa23ORCID,Elsharkawy Hesham45ORCID,Farag Ehab45ORCID,Cummings Kenneth15ORCID,Eid Gamal6,Mendoza Maria1,Mounir-Soliman Loran1,Rosenquist Richard7ORCID,Ali Sakr Esa Wael14

Affiliation:

1. Anesthesiology, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, E-31, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA

2. Anesthesiology Department, University of Cincinnati, 231 Albert Sabin Way, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0531, USA

3. Anesthesiology Department, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53792-3272, USA

4. CCLCM of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, E-31, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA

5. Anesthesia and Outcome Research, Department of General Anesthesia and Pain Management, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, E-31, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA

6. Outcome Research Department, Anesthesia Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, E-31, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA

7. Pain Management Department, Anesthesia Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, E-31, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA

Abstract

Continuous peripheral nerve blocks (CPNB) are commonly used for intraoperative and postoperative analgesia. Our study aimed at describing our experience with ambulatory peripheral nerve catheters. After Institutional Review Board approval, records for all patients discharged with supraclavicular or popliteal catheters between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2011 were reviewed. A licensed practitioner provided verbal and written instructions to the patients prior to discharge. Daily follow-up phone calls were conducted. Patients either removed their catheters at home with real-time simultaneous telephone guidance by a member of the Acute Pain Service or had them removed by the surgeon during a regular office visit. The primary outcome of this analysis was the incidence of complications, categorized as pharmacologic, infectious, or other. The secondary outcome measure was the average daily pain score. Our study included a total of 1059 patients with ambulatory catheters (769 supraclavicular, 290 popliteal). The median infusion duration was 5 days for both groups. Forty-two possible complications were identified: 13 infectious, 23 pharmacologic, and 6 labeled as other. Two patients had retained catheters, 2 had catheter leakage, and 2 had shortness of breath. Our study showed that prolonged use of ambulatory catheters for a median period of 5 days did not lead to an increased incidence of complications.

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

General Environmental Science,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Medicine

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3