Pharmacological Management of Chronic Neuropathic Pain – Consensus Statement and Guidelines from the Canadian Pain Society

Author:

Moulin DE1,Clark AJ2,Gilron I3,Ware MA4,Watson CPN5,Sessle BJ5,Coderre T4,Morley-Forster PK1,Stinson J6,Boulanger A7,Peng P58,Finley GA910,Taenzer P2,Squire P11,Dion D7,Cholkan A12,Gilani A13,Gordon A512,Henry J13,Jovey R5,Lynch M9,Mailis-Gagnon A5,Panju A13,Rollman GB1,Velly A14

Affiliation:

1. University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada

2. University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

3. Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada

4. McGill University, Montreal, Canada

5. University of Toronto, Canada

6. The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

7. Universite de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

8. University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

9. Dalhousie University, Canada

10. IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

11. University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

12. Wasser Pain Management Centre, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

13. McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

14. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA

Abstract

Neuropathic pain (NeP), generated by disorders of the peripheral and central nervous system, can be particularly severe and disabling. Prevalence estimates indicate that 2% to 3% of the population in the developed world suffer from NeP, which suggests that up to one million Canadians have this disabling condition. Evidence-based guidelines for the pharmacological management of NeP are therefore urgently needed. Randomized, controlled trials, systematic reviews and existing guidelines focusing on the pharmacological management of NeP were evaluated at a consensus meeting. Medications are recommended in the guidelines if their analgesic efficacy was supported by at least one methodologically sound, randomized, controlled trial showing significant benefit relative to placebo or another relevant control group. Recommendations for treatment are based on degree of evidence of analgesic efficacy, safety, ease of use and cost-effectiveness. Analgesic agents recommended for first-line treatments are certain antidepressants (tricyclics) and anticonvulsants (gabapentin and pregabalin). Second-line treatments recommended are serotonin noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors and topical lidocaine. Tramadol and controlled-release opioid analgesics are recommended as third-line treatments for moderate to severe pain. Recommended fourth-line treatments include cannabinoids, methadone and anticonvulsants with lesser evidence of efficacy, such as lamotrigine, topiramate and valproic acid. Treatment must be individualized for each patient based on efficacy, side-effect profile and drug accessibility, including cost. Further studies are required to examine head-to-head comparisons among analgesics, combinations of analgesics, long-term outcomes, and treatment of pediatric and central NeP.

Funder

Pfizer

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Neurology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3