Participant Experiences in the Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young Study: Common Reasons for Withdrawing

Author:

Lernmark Barbro1,Lynch Kristian2,Baxter Judith34,Roth Roswith5,Simell Tuula6,Smith Laura2,Swartling Ulrica1,Johnson Suzanne Bennett7,TEDDY Study Group 12356

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, CRC, Jan Waldenströms Gata 35, Skåne University Hospital (SUS), 20502 Malmö, Sweden

2. Health Informatics Institute, University of South Florida, 3650 Spectrum Boulevard, Suite 100, Tampa, FL 33612, USA

3. Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver-AMC, 1775 Aurora Court, Aurora, CO 80045, USA

4. Colorado School of Public Health, Department of Community and Behavioral Health, University of Colorado Denver-AMC, 13001 E. 17th Place, Aurora, CO 80045, USA

5. Institute of Diabetes Research, Helmholtz Center Munich and Clinic on the right of Isar, Technical University Munich, Research Group Diabetes e.V., Ingolstaedter Landstrasse 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany

6. Department of Pediatrics, University of Turku, Kiinamyllynkatu 4-8, 20100 Turku, Finland

7. Department of Medical Humanities and Social Sciences, Florida State University College of Medicine, 1115 West Call Street, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA

Abstract

Background. To characterize participant reasons for withdrawing from a diabetes focused longitudinal clinical observational trial (TEDDY) during the first three study years.Methods. 8677 children were recruited into the TEDDY study. At participant withdrawal staff recorded any reason parents provided for withdrawal. Reasons were categorized into (1) family characteristics and (2) protocol reasons. Families who informed staff of their withdrawal were classified as active withdrawals (AW); families without a final contact were considered passive withdrawals (PW).Results. Withdrawal was highest during the first study year(n=1220). Most families were AW (n=1549; 73.4%). PW was more common in the United States (n=1001; 37.8%) and among young mothers(p=0.001). The most frequent protocol characteristic was blood draw (55%) and the most common family reason was not having enough time (66%). The blood draw was more common among female participants; being too busy was more common among males. Both reasons were associated with study satisfaction.Conclusions. Results suggest that, for families of children genetically at risk for diabetes, procedures that can be painful/frightening should be used with caution. Study procedures must also be considered for the demands placed on participants. Study satisfaction should be regularly assessed as an indicator of risk for withdrawal.

Funder

The TEDDY Study Group

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

Endocrinology,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3