Factors Associated with Initial Mode of Breast Cancer Detection among Black Women in the Women’s Circle of Health Study

Author:

Szukis Holly A.1,Qin Bo2,Xing Cathleen Y.1,Doose Michelle1,Xu Baichen2,Tsui Jennifer23,Lin Yong14,Hirshfield Kim M.5,Ambrosone Christine B.6,Demissie Kitaw127,Hong Chi-Chen6,Bandera Elisa V.12,Llanos Adana A. M.12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Rutgers School of Public Health, 683 Hoes Lane West, Piscataway, NJ, USA

2. Cancer Prevention and Control, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ, USA

3. Department of Health Behavior, Society and Policy, Rutgers School of Public Health, 683 Hoes Lane West, Piscataway, NJ, USA

4. Biometrics Division, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ, USA

5. Division of Medical Oncology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA

6. Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA

7. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, SUNY Downstate School of Public Health, Brooklyn, NY, USA

Abstract

Mammogram-detected breast cancers have a better prognosis than those identified through clinical breast exam (CBE) or through self-detection, primarily because tumors detected by mammography are more likely to be smaller and do not involve regional nodes. In a sample of 1,322 Black women, aged 40-75 years, diagnosed with breast cancer between 2002 and 2016, we evaluated factors associated with CBE and self-detection versus screening mammogram as the initial mode of breast cancer detection, using multivariable logistic regression models. Compared with screening mammogram, history of routine screening mammogram (OR 0.20, 95% CI: 0.07, 0.54) and performance of breast self-examination (BSE) (OR 0.31, 95% CI: 0.13, 0.74) before diagnosis were associated with lower odds of CBE as the initial mode of detection, while performance of CBEs before diagnosis (OR 11.04, 95% CI: 2.24, 54.55) was positively associated. Lower body mass index (<25.0 kg/m2 vs. ≥35.0 kg/m2: OR 2.46, 95% CI: 1.52, 3.98), performance of BSEs before diagnosis (less than once per month: OR 4.08, 95% CI: 2.45, 6.78; at least monthly: OR 4.99, 95% CI: 3.13, 7.97), and larger tumor size (1.0-2.0 cm vs. <1.0 cm: OR 2.92, 95% CI: 1.84, 4.64; >2.0 cm vs. <1.0 cm: OR 6.41, 95% CI: 3.30, 12.46) were associated with increased odds of self-detection relative to screening mammogram. The odds of CBE and self-detection as initial modes of breast cancer detection among Black women are independently associated with breast care and breast cancer screening services before diagnosis and with larger tumors at diagnosis.

Funder

National Cancer Institute

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3