Leveraging the GIDAS Database for the Criticality Analysis of Automated Driving Systems

Author:

Babisch Stefan1,Neurohr Christian2ORCID,Westhofen Lukas2ORCID,Schoenawa Stefan3,Liers Henrik1

Affiliation:

1. VUFO GmbH, Semperstrase 2A, 01069 Dresden, Germany

2. German Aerospace Center (DLR) e.V., Institute of Systems Engineering for Future Mobility, Escherweg 2, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany

3. Volkswagen Group, Berliner Ring 2, 38440 Wolfsburg, Germany

Abstract

A safe introduction of automated driving systems on urban roads requires a thorough understanding of the traffic conflicts and accidents. This understanding is paramount to constructively safeguard these systems, i.e., to design a system that exhibits an adequate performance even in critical situations. In this work, we present an approach to gather knowledge by analyzing the German In-Depth Accident Study (GIDAS) database, which is representative of all German traffic accidents, along with the influencing factors that are hypothesized to be associated with increased criticality in relation to automated driving. In order to gain an insight into the risk associated with these factors in real-world accidents, we determine their presence in the database’s accident cases within a selected operational domain, enabled by translation from a natural language description to the database scheme employed by GIDAS. This initial catalog as well as the subsequent statistical considerations is motivated by analyzing the criticality for automated driving systems in urban areas. Based on this catalog, our work delineates a method for quantification of risk associated with such influencing factors in a given operational domain based on real-world accident data. This quantification can subsequently be used in decompositional, scenario-based risk assessment before system design and for the embedding safety argumentation. This paper, therefore, provides a blueprint of how the matured field of traffic accident research studies and its results, in particular accident databases, can be leveraged for risk assessment of the operational domain of automated driving systems.

Funder

German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

Strategy and Management,Computer Science Applications,Mechanical Engineering,Economics and Econometrics,Automotive Engineering

Reference51 articles.

1. On the validation of complex systems operating in open contexts;A. Poddey,2019

2. The release of autonomous vehicles;W. Wachenfeld,2016

3. Driving to safety: How many miles of driving would it take to demonstrate autonomous vehicle reliability?

4. Defining and Substantiating the Terms Scene, Situation, and Scenario for Automated Driving

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. How would autonomous vehicles behave in real-world crash scenarios?;Accident Analysis & Prevention;2024-07

2. Answering Temporal Conjunctive Queries over Description Logic Ontologies for Situation Recognition in Complex Operational Domains;Lecture Notes in Computer Science;2024

3. Towards Scenario-Based Certification of Highly Automated Railway Systems;Reliability, Safety, and Security of Railway Systems. Modelling, Analysis, Verification, and Certification;2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3