Risk Stratification after Biochemical Failure following Curative Treatment of Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer: Data from the TROG 96.01 Trial

Author:

Steigler Allison1,Denham James W.12,Lamb David S.3,Spry Nigel A.4,Joseph David4,Matthews John5,Atkinson Chris6,Turner Sandra7,North John8,Christie David9,Tai Keen-Hun10,Wynne Chris6

Affiliation:

1. School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia

2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Locked Bag 7, Hunter Region Mail Centre, NSW 2310, Australia

3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Wellington Cancer Centre, Riddiford Street, Newtown, Wellington 6021, New Zealand

4. Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Hospital Avenue, Nedlands, Perth, WA 6009, Australia

5. Department of Radiation Oncology, Auckland Hospital, 2 Park Road, Grafton, Auckland 1023, New Zealand

6. Department of Radiation Oncology, St George’s Cancer Care Centre, 131 Leinster Road, Strowan, Christchurch 8014, New Zealand

7. Department of Radiation Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Corner Hawkesbury Road and Darcy Road, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia

8. Department of Radiation Oncology, Dunedin Hospital, 201 Great King Street, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand

9. Department of Radiation Oncology, Premion, Inland Drive, Tugun, QLD 4224, Australia

10. Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, St Andrews Place, East Melbourne, VIC 3002, Australia

Abstract

Purpose. Survival following biochemical failure is highly variable. Using a randomized trial dataset, we sought to define a risk stratification scheme in men with locally advanced prostate cancer (LAPC).Methods. The TROG 96.01 trial randomized 802 men with LAPC to radiation ± neoadjuvant androgen suppression therapy (AST) between 1996 and 2000. Ten-year follow-up data was used to develop three-tier post-biochemical failure risk stratification schemes based on cutpoints of time to biochemical failure (TTBF) and PSA doubling time (PSADT). Schemes were evaluated in univariable, competing risk models for prostate cancer-specific mortality. The performance was assessed by c-indices and internally validated by the simple bootstrap method. Performance rankings were compared in sensitivity analyses using multivariable models and variations in PSADT calculation.Results. 485 men developed biochemical failure. c-indices ranged between 0.630 and 0.730. The most discriminatory scheme had a high risk category defined by PSADT < 4 months or TTBF < 1 year and low risk category by PSADT > 9 months or TTBF > 3 years.Conclusion. TTBF and PSADT can be combined to define risk stratification schemes after biochemical failure in men with LAPC treated with short-term AST and radiotherapy. External validation, particularly in long-term AST and radiotherapy datasets, is necessary.

Funder

National Health and Medical Research Council

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

Cancer Research,Urology,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3