Gaps in Hospice and Palliative Care Research: A Scoping Review of the North American Literature

Author:

Antonacci Rebecca12ORCID,Barrie Carol34,Baxter Sharon45,Chaffey Sarah1,Chary Srini46,Grassau Pamela7,Hammond Chad45,Mirhosseini Mehrnoush48,Mirza Raza M.12,Murzin Kate49,Klinger Christopher A.246

Affiliation:

1. Institute for Life Course and Aging, Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, 246 Bloor Street West, Suite 238, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1V4, Canada

2. National Initiative for the Care of the Elderly, 246 Bloor Street West, Suite 234, Toronto, Ontario M4S 1V4, Canada

3. Canadian Frailty Network, Kidd House, 100 Stuart Street, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada

4. Quality End-of-Life Care Coalition of Canada, Annex D, Saint-Vincent Hospital, 60 Cambridge Street North, Ottawa, Ontario K1R 7A5, Canada

5. Canadian Hospice Palliative Care Association, Annex D, Saint-Vincent Hospital, 60 Cambridge Street North, Ottawa, Ontario K1R 7A5, Canada

6. Pallium Canada, 75 Bruyère Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1N 5C7, Canada

7. School of Social Work, Carleton University, Dunton Tower, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Suite 509, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada

8. Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, College Plaza, 112 Street, Suite 205, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2R3, Canada

9. Realize, 1240 Bay Street, Suite 600, Toronto, Ontario M5R 2A7, Canada

Abstract

Background. The demand for hospice and palliative care is growing as a result of the increase of an aging population, which is most prominent in North America. Despite the importance of the topic and an increase in hospice and palliative care utilization, there still are gaps in research and evidence within the field. Aim. To determine what gaps currently exist in hospice and palliative/end-of-life care research within the context of a North American setting to ensure that future directions are grounded in appropriate evidence. Methods. Using Arksey and O’Malley’s scoping review framework, six peer-reviewed, and four grey electronic literature databases in healthcare and the social sciences were searched in mid-2019. 111 full-text articles were retrieved, with 25 articles and reports meeting the inclusion criteria. Major themes were identified through thematic context analysis: (1) clinical, (2) system access to care, (3) research methodology, and (4) caregiving-related research gaps. Results. Findings include strategies for engaging stakeholder organizations and funding agencies, implications for other stakeholder groups such as clinicians and researchers, and highlight implications for policy (e.g., national framework discussion) and practice (e.g., healthcare provider education and training and public awareness). Conclusion. Reviewing and addressing targeted research gaps is essential to inform future directions in Canada and beyond.

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

Geriatrics and Gerontology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3