Abstract
Background: Paracetamol, also known as acetaminophen, is categorized as an analgesic and antipyretic medication and is available as over the counter (OTC) medication. It is commonly used in conditions associated with pain and fever. There is a tendency for community to prefer using imported paracetamol tablets from Europe and United States than from Asia and Africa worrying of the quality of the products. Safety, effectiveness, and efficacy of a medicine can be guaranteed when its quality is reliable; however, there is limited data on the quality of locally manufactured paracetamol tablets, thus necessitating this study.Aim: This study is aimed at assessing the quality of paracetamol tablets 500 mg manufactured by local companies by evaluating their physical parameters, assay results, and dissolution profiles. The compliance of these tablets with the specifications outlined in the British Pharmacopoeia (BP) was analyzed. Additionally, a comparative dissolution test was conducted to assess dissolution profile for innovator product and generics.Method: Five different brands from East African countries with 76 tablets from each brand were compared with the innovator product regarding weight variation, hardness, friability, assay, and dissolution test based on the BP specifications.Results and discussion: All samples of paracetamol tablets 500 mg from the local manufacturers in this study met the specifications set by the BP for physical parameters, including weight variation, friability, hardness, and disintegration tests. The weight variation test, directly related to drug content variation, demonstrated compliance within the acceptable deviation of 5%. Similarly, the assay test, which determines the concentration of the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API), confirmed that all samples complied with the acceptable concentration range of 90%–110% for paracetamol. The dissolution test, assessing the percentage release of the API within a specified time, demonstrated that at 15 min, two samples (diodol and enamol) exhibited lower concentration releases than the required 80%, indicating potential delays in their bioavailability and onset of action.Conclusion: To conclude, all samples had good quality and they can be used for their therapeutic purposes.