Knowledge Mobilisation in Safeguarding Adults and Children for Healthcare in England

Author:

Clark Maria T.1ORCID,Vakaj Edlira2ORCID,Biernat Karolina N.3ORCID,McKnight Louise K.4,Cowdell Fiona5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Health Sciences (Nursing), University of Nottingham, Medical School, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2HA, UK

2. Computing and Data Science, Birmingham City University, Westbourne Road, Birmingham B15 3TN, UK

3. Department of Computing and Data Science, Birmingham City University, Westbourne Road, Birmingham B15 3TN, UK

4. Department of Radiography, School of Health Sciences, Birmingham City University, Westbourne Road, Birmingham B15 3TN, UK

5. Nursing and Health Research, Ravensbury House, Birmingham City University, Westbourne Road, Birmingham B15 3TN, UK

Abstract

Safeguarding for healthcare involves working together to protect adults, children, and young people at risk of harm. Despite global research and national guidance outlining health professionals’ roles in this regard, there is limited knowledge about the type of strategies used to mobilise safeguarding research to practitioners in England. Our critical interpretive synthesis (CIS) sought to explore how safeguarding knowledge is mobilised to enable practitioners to use research effectively. This synthesis aimed to bridge the theory-practice gap in mobilising safeguarding knowledge to practitioners. Knowledge mobilisation (KMb) is an emerging discipline concerned with moving knowledge across communities to catalyse change. This review aimed to build understanding about how safeguarding knowledge is mobilised for healthcare in England and to synthesise the type of approaches undertaken to protect adults and children from harms, including abuse. A critical interpretive synthesis was undertaken using KMb theory and computer-assisted modelling technologies for secondary thematic analysis of complex literature of relevance, including qualitative research, reviews, and reports. Few papers informed how safeguarding knowledge is mobilised for healthcare in England. Learning from experience dominated the literature in three ways: (i) crisis response, (ii) practice engagement, and (iii) influencing actions (for “best” practice). Embedding safeguarding knowledge and skills in healthcare settings usually followed a crisis response. Learning from experience showed movement between practice engagement and influencing actions for adult and/or child protection. KMb might be useful in supporting the implementation of evidence-based safeguarding for practice. CIS identified a gap in how safeguarding research is mobilised to practitioners for healthcare. KMb theory provided an analytical bridge to computer-assisted modelling of factors associated with moving learning from experience to learning in practice. Future research could build on hybrid synthesising of safeguarding functions and impacts for healthcare, to enable practitioners to protect adults and children from multiple harms, including violence and abuse.

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,Sociology and Political Science,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Reference96 articles.

1. Health and care act;HM Government,2022

2. Care act;HM Government,2014

3. Health and social care (safety and quality) act;HM Government,2015

4. Safeguarding children, young people and adults at risk in the nhs: safeguarding accountability and assurance framework;NHS England,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3