The Benefit of a Mechanical Needle Stimulation Pad in Patients with Chronic Neck and Lower Back Pain: Two Randomized Controlled Pilot Studies

Author:

Hohmann Claudia1,Ullrich Isabella1,Lauche Romy1,Choi Kyung-Eun1,Lüdtke Rainer2,Rolke Roman3,Cramer Holger1,Saha Felix Joyonto1,Rampp Thomas1,Michalsen Andreas4,Langhorst Jost1,Dobos Gustav1,Musial Frauke15

Affiliation:

1. Chair of Complementary and Integrative Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Knappschafts-Krankenhaus, Am Deimelsberg 34A, 45276 Essen, Germany

2. Karl und Veronica Carstens Foundation, 45276 Essen, Germany

3. Department of Palliative Care, University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany

4. Department of Integrative and Complementary Medicine, Institute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Immanuel Hospital Berlin, Charité University Medical Centre Berlin, 14109 Berlin, Germany

5. Department of Community Medicine, The National Research Centre in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), University of Tromsø, 9037 Tromsø, Norway

Abstract

Objectives. The objective was to investigate whether a treatment with a needle stimulation pad (NSP) changes perceived pain and/or sensory thresholds in patients with chronic neck (NP) and lower back pain (BP).Methods. 40 patients with chronic NP and 42 patients with chronic BP were equally randomized to either treatment or waiting list control group. The treatment group self-administered a NSP over a period of 14 days. Pain ratings were recorded on numerical rating scales (NRSs). Mechanical detection thresholds (MDTs) and pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) were determined at the site of maximal pain and in the adjacent region, vibration detection thresholds (VDT) were measured at close spinal processes. The Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire (NPQ) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were utilized for the NP and BP study, respectively.Results. NRS ratings were significantly reduced for the treatment groups compared to the control groups (NP:P=.021and BP:P<.001), accompanied by a significant increase of PPT at pain maximum (NP:P=.032and BP:P=.013). There was no effect on VDT and MDT. The NPQ showed also a significant improvement, but not the ODI.Conclusions. The mechanical NSP seems to be an effective treatment method for chronic NP and BP.

Funder

Karl and Veronica Carstens Foundation

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

Complementary and alternative medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3