PET/CT Imaging as a Diagnostic Tool in Distinguishing Well-Differentiated versus Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma

Author:

Parkes Amanda12,Urquiola Elizabeth3,Bhosale Priya4ORCID,Lin Heather5,Watson Kelsey6,Wang Wei-Lien7,Feig Barry6,Torres Keila6,Roland Christina L.6,Conley Anthony P.3,Zarzour Maria3,Livingston J. Andrew3,Ratan Ravin3ORCID,Ludwig Joseph3,Araujo Dejka M.3ORCID,Ravi Vinod3,Benjamin Robert S.3ORCID,Patel Shreyaskumar3ORCID,Somaiah Neeta3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA

2. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Division of Cancer Medicine, Houston, TX, USA

3. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, Houston, TX, USA

4. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Houston, TX, USA

5. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Biostatistics, Houston, TX, USA

6. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Surgical Oncology, Houston, TX, USA

7. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Pathology, Houston, TX, USA

Abstract

Distinguishing well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS) from dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) is essential given distinct treatment paradigms and chemosensitivity. Percutaneous biopsy has a low sensitivity for detecting DDLPS. We sought to identify the diagnostic utility of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in identifying WDLPS versus DDLPS. An independent radiologist reviewed PET/CT images to identify target lesions and determine the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax). An independent pathologist review confirmed WDLPS or DDLPS histology. A binary cutoff point of SUVmax was identified using a classification and regression trees (CART) algorithm. We identified 20 patients with WDLPS or DDLPS with 26 PET/CTs performed for separate recurrences that were followed by surgical sampling. Of the 26 records, 12 were DDLPS (46%) and 14 were WDLPS (54%). Patients with DDLPS had significantly higher SUVmax than those with WDLPS (pvalue = 0.0035). A SUVmax of 4 was identified as the cutoff point. Using this cutoff, the sensitivity of SUVmax identifying a case as DDLPS was 83.3% (95% CI: 51.6%, 97.9%) and the specificity was 85.7% (95% CI: 57.2%, 98.2%). PET/CT is a sensitive and specific diagnostic tool to identify the presence of dedifferentiation within the tumor.

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3