Nurses’ Work Methods Assessment Scale: A Construct Validation

Author:

Ventura-Silva J. M.12ORCID,Martins M. M.34,Trindade L. L.5,Faria A. C.16,Barros S. C.7ORCID,Melo R. M.28,Oliveira I. J.29ORCID,Castro S. F.10ORCID,Ribeiro O. M.34ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences (ICBAS) of University of Porto, Porto 4050-313, Portugal

2. Portuguese Red Cross Northern Health School, Oliveira de Azeméis 3720-126, Portugal

3. Nursing School of Porto, Porto 4200-072, Portugal

4. CINTESIS@RISE, Porto 4200-450, Portugal

5. Nursing, Santa Catarina State University, Chapeco 89.815-630, Brazil

6. Grouping of Health Centers Ave/Famalicao-North Region Health Administration, Vila Nova de Famalicao 4760-412, Portugal

7. University Hospital Center of São João, Porto 4200–319, Portugal

8. Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing (UICISA: E), Health School of the Polytechnic Institute of Viseu, Viseu 3504-510, Portugal

9. Center for Health Studies and Research, Univesrsity of Coimbra (CEISUC), Coimbra 3004-512, Portugal

10. Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto Francisco Gentil, Porto 4200-072, Portugal

Abstract

Background. A nursing work method is the base for the organization and implementation of nursing care to patients based on nurses’ skills. Nurses’ work methods are consensually organized into two groups: task-oriented work methods (functional method) and client-centered work methods (teamwork method, individual work method, and work method per reference nurse). As for the impact of the work method on clients, we highlight the interference in the quality of care provided and, regarding nurses, the impact on workload and job satisfaction. Therefore, the existence of tools that allow identifying the organizational methodologies of nursing care is relevant. Aim. The aim of the study is to test the validity and reliability of the nurses work methods assessment scale (NWMAS). Methods. The methodological study followed the recommendations of the EQUATOR network. The NWMAS was previously developed as a self-completion questionnaire. To determine construct validity, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed. Results. 325 participants were enrolled in this study. In exploratory factor analysis, the 25 items comprising NWMAS were distributed in five dimensions, contemplating the work methods. Cronbach’s alpha of the total scale was 0.846. The confirmatory factor analysis revealed a good fit. Conclusion. The NWMAS is a valid and reliable tool. Implications for Nursing Practice. The NWMAS identifies the work methods adopted by nurses in hospital settings, is a valuable tool for nursing management, and contributes to the definition of strategies that promote the quality of nursing care and the safety of patients.

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

General Nursing

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3