Econometric Analysis of the Impact of Financial Structure on Innovation Based on the Fixed Effects Panel Model

Author:

Wang Cheng-Ben1ORCID,Huang Zhigang1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Finance, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 102206, China

Abstract

This study addresses the impact of financial structure on innovation. The mechanism of the impact of financial structure on innovation at different levels of economic development is elucidated from the perspective of optimal financial structure decision theory and development economics, and empirical evidence is provided using manufacturing data from 59 countries or regions for the period 1996–2015. The study finds that financial structure has no significant effect on innovation at lower levels of economic development, but at higher levels of economic development, market-based financial structure significantly promotes innovation in the industry. The role of financial structure in innovation shifts in the interval where per capita income is greater than 9747 International dollar (hereinafter called I$9747) and less than I$17070. This paper verifies that the innovation approach of technological imitation requires the support of a bank-based financial structure, while the innovation approach of independent innovation requires the support of a market-based financial structure. The differences in innovation approaches at different stages of economic development lead to the evolution of the inherent demand for financial structures in the economy. Promoting the evolution of financial structures according to the stage of economic development is of great significance in building an innovative country and leading the sustainable and healthy development of the economy.

Funder

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

General Engineering,General Mathematics

Reference56 articles.

1. Financial reforms in Latin America;H. Huang;Journal of Latin American Studies,1997

2. ‘The big bang’-Japan’s financial reform and its implementation prospects;J. Chen;The Journal of World Economy,1998

3. From the failure of shock” to the “post-Washington Consensus”;G. W. Kolodko;Comparative Economic & Social Systems,1999

4. A comparative study of the Washington Consensus and the beijing Consensus;C. Tian;Comparative Economic & Social Systems,2005

5. Research on Taiwan financial reform;P. Chen;Asia-pacific Economic Review,2010

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3