Optimizing Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease – Practical Issues: A Canadian Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline

Author:

Marciniuk Darcy D1,Brooks Dina2,Butcher Scott1,Debigare Richard3,Dechman Gail4,Ford Gordon5,Pepin Veronique6,Reid Darlene7,Sheel Andrew W7,Stickland Micheal K8,Todd David C9,Walker Shannon L7,Aaron Shawn D10,Balter Meyer2,Bourbeau Jean11,Hernandez Paul4,Maltais Francois3,O’Donnell Denis E12,Bleakney Donna13,Carlin Brian14,Goldstein Roger2,Muthuri Stella K15

Affiliation:

1. University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

2. University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

3. Laval University, Sainte-Foy, Quebec, Canada

4. Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

5. University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

6. Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

7. University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

8. University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

9. McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada

10. University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

11. McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

12. Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada

13. Saskatoon Health Region, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

14. Drexel University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

15. Canadian Thoracic Society, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Abstract

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) participation is the standard of care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who remain symptomatic despite bronchodilator therapies. However, there are questions about specific aspects of PR programming including optimal site of rehabilitation delivery, components of rehabilitation programming, duration of rehabilitation, target populations and timing of rehabilitation. The present document was compiled to specifically address these important clinical issues, using an evidence-based, systematic review process led by a representative interprofessional panel of experts.The evidence reveals there are no differences in major patient-related outcomes of PR between nonhospital- (community or home sites) or hospital-based sites. There is strong support to recommend that COPD patients initiate PR within one month following an acute exacerbation due to benefits of improved dyspnea, exercise tolerance and health-related quality of life relative to usual care. Moreover, the benefits of PR are evident in both men and women, and in patients with moderate, severe and very severe COPD. The current review also suggests that longer PR programs, beyond six to eight weeks duration, be provided for COPD patients, and that while aerobic training is the foundation of PR, endurance and functional ability may be further improved with both aerobic and resistance training.

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3