Study on Allopathic and Alternative Treatments of Asthma and Factors Influencing Treatment Choices

Author:

Farooq Javeria1ORCID,Khaliq Sheikh Abdul2ORCID,Ghuman Faiza3ORCID,Shaikh Javeria4ORCID,Azhar Iqbal5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Health Sciences, Iqra University, Karachi, Pakistan

2. Department of Pharmacy Practice and Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Hamdard University, Karachi 74600, Pakistan

3. Department of Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan

4. Department of Pulmonology, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan

5. Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Karachi, Karachi, Pakistan

Abstract

Background and Objective. Several treatments are used to attain good control of symptoms and to reduce asthmatic exacerbations. The survey was designed to compare different systems of treatments for asthma and to explore the most preferred treatment in terms of efficacy, side effects, long-term use, and satisfaction. Materials and Methods. The cross-sectional survey was conducted; primary data were collected from asthmatic patients in different hospitals and clinics of allopathic, homeopathic, and herbal practitioners in Karachi, Pakistan. The study duration was from January 2020 to December 2020. Asthmatic patients aged over 13 years were selected for the study. A written informed consent was taken from the patients before the interview. Collected data were analyzed by the Statistical Package of Social Sciences (SPSS) 22. Result. Among 255 asthmatic patients; 51.4% (n = 131) were male and 48.6% (n = 124) were female. For control of acute attacks of asthma 88.2% ( p = 0.0001 ) of patients significantly preferred allopathic treatment while 6.3% ( p = 0.008 ) used homeopathic treatment and 5.5% chose herbal treatment. For maintenance of asthma, 78.8% ( p = 0.0001 ) patients used allopathic treatment while 12.4% ( p = 0.0001 ) homeopathic and 8.8% ( p = 0.0001 ) patients used herbal treatment. About 63.4% ( p = 0.0001 ) of the asthmatic patients used short-acting β-2 agonists for managing acute asthmatic episodes while long-acting β-2 agonists ( p = 0.0001 ) and inhaled corticosteroids ( p = 0.0001 ) were found to be the preferred medicines for maintenance therapy. Effectiveness of treatment ( p = 0.004 ) and cost effectiveness ( p = 0.0001 ) significantly act as contributing factors for the selection of the treatment. The majority of the patients were satisfied with their chosen treatments for control of asthmatic symptoms. Conclusion. Most asthmatic patients preferred allopathic treatment for the management of acute episodes and control of asthmatic symptoms. It was found that the major factors for selecting a specific treatment include effectiveness, cost, and minimal side effects.

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

Complementary and alternative medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3