A Controlled Investigation of Continuing Pain Education for Long-Term Care Staff

Author:

Ghandehari Omeed O12,Hadjistavropoulos Thomas12,Williams Jaime2,Thorpe Lilian3,Alfano Dennis P1,Bello-Haas Vanina Dal4,Malloy David C5,Martin Ronald R6,Rahaman Omar7,Zwakhalen Sandra MG8,Carleton R Nicholas1,Hunter Paulette V9,Lix Lisa M10

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology, University of Regina, Regina, Canada

2. Centre on Aging and Health, University of Regina, Regina, Canada

3. Department of Community Health and Epidemiology and Department of Psychiatry, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

4. School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

5. Faculty of Kinesiology and Health Studies, University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada

6. Faculty of Education, University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada

7. Meadowlark Health Centre, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

8. Department of Health Services Research, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands

9. St Thomas More College, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

10. School of Public Health, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The underassessment and undertreatment of pain in residents of long-term care (LTC) facilities has been well documented. Gaps in staff knowledge and inaccurate beliefs have been identified as contributors.OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effectiveness of an expert-based continuing education program in pain assessment/management for LTC staff.METHODS: Participants included 131 LTC staff members who were randomly assigned to either an interactive pain education (PE) program, which addressed gaps in knowledge such as medication management, or an interactive control program consisting of general dementia education without a specific clinical focus. Participants attended three sessions, each lasting 3 h, and completed measures of pain-related knowledge and attitudes/beliefs before, immediately after and two weeks following the program. Focus groups were conducted with a subset of participants to gauge perception of the training program and barriers to implementing pain-related strategies.RESULTS: Analysis using ANOVA revealed that PE participants demonstrated larger gains compared with control participants with regard to pain knowledge and pain beliefs. Barriers to implementing pain-related strategies certainly exist. Nonetheless, qualitative analyses demonstrated that PE participants reported that they overcame many of these barriers and used pain management strategies four times more frequently than control participants.CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to previous research, the present study found that the interactive PE program was effective in changing pain beliefs and improving knowledge. Continuing PE in LTC has the potential to address knowledge gaps among front-line LTC providers.

Funder

Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Neurology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3