Anatomical and Functional Outcomes of Vitrectomy with/without Intravitreal Methotrexate Infusion for Management of Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy Secondary to Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment

Abstract

Purpose. To assess the anatomical and functional outcomes of intravitreal infusion of methotrexate (MTX) during pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) associated with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). Methods. Comparative interventional nonrandomized study including consecutive patients who had vitrectomy for RRD. The study included six groups. Groups I (established PVR), II (high risk of PVR), and III (no risk of PVR) comprised prospectively recruited study eyes, which received PPV and adjuvant intravitreal MTX infusion equivalent to 400 μg/0.1 mL. Groups IA, IIA, and IIIA comprised retrospectively recruited control groups. Main outcome measures were retinal reattachment at the end of 6 months, visual outcome, and complications. Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test analyzed categorical variables. ANOVA test and Kruskal–Wallis test analyzed quantitative variables. Mann–Whitney U-test and independent t-test evaluated the difference between each group and its control. Comparison between two paired groups was done by Wilcoxon Rank test. The Kaplan–Meier method was used for survival analysis and the log-rank test estimated differences in event-free survival across the groups. $P$ was significant at <0.05. Results. The study included 190 eyes of 188 patients. Study Groups I, II, and III included 42, 35, and 24 eyes, respectively. Mean age was 45 years. Male gender constituted 70% of patients. Mean follow-up period was 6 months. Control Groups IA, IIA, and IIIA included 30, 30, and 29 eyes, respectively. Mean age was 50 years. Male gender constituted 50%. Mean follow-up period was 7 months. Median rate of retinal reattachment was 82% in the study eyes versus 86% in the control eyes. The difference in the retinal reattachment rates between each study group and its respective control was not statistically significant, Group I-IA $\left(p=\hspace{0.17em}0.2\right)$ , Group II-IIA $\left(p=0.07\right)$ , and Group III-IIIA $\left(p=0.07\right)$ . BCVA improved by a mean of 4 lines in the study eyes versus 3 lines in the control eyes. The difference in visual outcome between each study group and its respective control was statistically significant between Groups II-IIA and III-IIIA, $p=0.03$ , but not between Groups I-IA, $p=0.07$ . We did not detect complications attributed to MTX use in the study eyes. Conclusion. Intravitreal infusion of MTX during PPV is a safe adjuvant therapy in RRD patients with and without PVR. MTX yields superior functional outcomes in patients at high risk of PVR and in patients with no risk of PVR compared to PPV without MTX, but not in cases with established PVR. MTX did not confer an additional advantage in terms of retinal reattachment rate. Summary. Proliferative vitreoretinopathy is a major cause of failure in surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Methotrexate as an adjuvant therapy blocks essential drivers in the pathogenetic cascade leading to PVR. Intravitreal infusion has the advantage of blocking the pathology in its nascence and obviates the need for repeated intravitreal injections of the drug.