One-Year Multicenter Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing OT Equator® and Locator Attachments to Retain an Early Loaded Implant Overdenture on Two Implants

Author:

Tallarico Marco1,Fiorillo Luca2345ORCID,Montanari Marco6,Scrascia Roberto7,Cristache Corina Marilena8,Ferrari Emiliano9,Casucci Alessio10,Xhanari Erta3,Lupi Saturnino Marco11ORCID,Ieria Irene12,Baldoni Edoardo1,Rodriguez y Baena Ruggero11,Cervino Gabriele2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Dentistry, Sassari 07100, Italy

2. School of Dentistry, Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria 1, Messina 98125, Italy

3. School of Dentistry, Aldent University, Tirana 1001, Albania

4. Multidisciplinary Department of Medical-Surgical and Odontostomatological Specialties, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples 80121, Italy

5. Department of Prosthodontics, Dr D. Y. Patil Dental College and Hospital, Dr D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune 411018, India

6. Private Practice, Cesena 41121, Italy

7. Independent Researcher, Taranto 74121, Italy

8. Faculty of Midwifery and Medical Assisting, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest 020021, Romania

9. Independent Researcher, Bologna 40123, Italy

10. Independent Researcher, Montepulciano Stazione 53045, Italy

11. Dental Clinic, University of Pavia, Pavia 27100, Italy

12. Independent Researcher, Rome 00151, Italy

Abstract

This investigation aimed to compare the effectiveness of the OT Equator® (Rhein, Bologna, Italy) and the Locator attachment systems used to retain early loaded implant-retained overdentures. This study was designed as a multicenter randomised controlled trial of parallel groups. After implant placement, the patients were randomised to receive OT Equator® attachments in the test group or Locator attachments in the control group. The outcome measures were implant and prosthetic success and survival rates, any biological and technical complication, marginal bone loss, patients’ satisfaction, and periodontal parameters. Overall, 42 patients were consecutively enrolled and treated. One implant was lost in the control group, while no implants were lost in the test group. No prostheses failed in both groups. Only a few complications were experienced in both groups. The main was represented by loss of retention of the attachments (retentive caps). The OT Equator® attachment showed statistically lower periodontal parameters. In conclusion, both attachment systems were suitable for overdenture implant retention.

Funder

Università degli Studi di Sassari

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

Biomedical Engineering,Biomaterials

Reference22 articles.

1. Dental implants in the elderly population: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2. The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Montreal, quebec, Canada;J. S. Feine;The International Journal of Prosthodontics,2002

3. Treatment concept for mandibular overdentures supported by endosseous implants: a literature review;R. H. Batenburg;The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants,1998

4. Mandibular overdentures supported by two or four endosteal implants

5. Effect of accelerated aging on the microhardness and color stability of flexible resins for dentures

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3