A Retrospective Cohort Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Sequential versus Concurrent Intrapleural Instillation of Tissue Plasminogen Activator and DNase for Pleural Infection

Author:

Goh Ken Junyang1ORCID,Chew Wui Mei2,Ong Jasmine Chiat Ling3,Leong Carrie Kah-Lai1,Mohamed Noor Imran Bin2,Anantham Devanand1,Hui Li Yan Sandra2,Choong Mindy Chu Ming4,Liew Charlene Jin Yee5,Gutierrez Marnie Tamayo6,Wong Jane Jing Yi7,Phua Ivana Gilcrist Chiew Sian7,Lim Wen Ting7,Tan Qiao Li1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore

2. Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore

3. Division of Pharmacy, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore

4. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore

5. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Changi General Hospital, Singapore

6. Advanced Practice Nurse Development, Changi General Hospital, Singapore

7. Division of Nursing, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore

Abstract

Background and Objective. Intrapleural tissue plasminogen activator/deoxyribonuclease (tPA/DNase) is increasingly being used for pleural infections. Compared to sequential instillation of tPA/DNase, concurrent instillation considerably reduces the complexity of the administration process and reduces workload and the number of times the chest drain is accessed. However, it remains unclear if concurrent intrapleural therapy is as efficacious or safe as sequential intrapleural therapy. Methods. We conducted a retrospective review of patients with pleural infection requiring intrapleural therapy at two tertiary referral centres. Results. We included 84 (62.2%) and 51 (37.8%) patients who received sequential and concurrent intrapleural therapy, respectively. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics, including age, RAPID score, and percentage of pleural opacity on radiographs before intrapleural therapy, were similar in both groups. Treatment failure rates (defined by either in-hospital mortality, surgical intervention, or 30-day readmission for pleural infection) were 9.5% and 5.9% with sequential and concurrent intrapleural therapy, respectively ( p = 0.534 ). This translates to a treatment success rate of 90.5% and 94.1% for sequential and concurrent intrapleural therapy, respectively. There was no significant difference in the decrease in percentage of pleural effusion size on chest radiographs (15.1% [IQR 6-35.7] versus 26.6% [IQR 9.9-38.7], p = 0.143 ) between sequential and concurrent therapy, respectively. There were also no significant differences in the rate of pleural bleeding (4.8% versus 9.8%, p = 0.298 ) and chest pain (13.1% versus 9.8%, p = 0.566 ) between sequential and concurrent therapy, respectively. Conclusion. Our study adds to the growing literature on the safety and efficacy of concurrent intrapleural therapy in pleural infection.

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3