Breast Cancer Survivorship and Level of Institutional Involvement Utilizing Integrative Oncology

Author:

Crudup Terri1ORCID,Li Linna2ORCID,Dorr Jennifer Wright3ORCID,Lawson Elizabeth1ORCID,Stout Rachel1ORCID,Niknam Pedram Vazifeh1ORCID,Jones Judi1ORCID,Steen Robert G.4ORCID,Casner Susan4ORCID,Lu Lynn L.5ORCID,Wang Yi5ORCID,Scott James1ORCID,Zanine Shelby1ORCID,Robertshaw Stacey1ORCID,Broderick Gabriella1ORCID,Singh Simarpreet6ORCID,Lu Jingsong5ORCID,Zhou Li5ORCID,Palommella Vaishali1ORCID,Harris Tye1ORCID,Hanamirian Michael1ORCID,Reddy Mula Shivani7ORCID,Cowgill Bruce1ORCID,Rice Jen1ORCID,Nagaraja Avinash7ORCID,Jonas Wayne3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Primary Intelligence, IQVIA, Plymouth Meeting, PA, USA

2. Radiation Oncology, Bryn Mawr Hospital, Bryn Mawr, PA, USA

3. Integrative Health Programs, Samueli Foundation, Alexandria, VA, USA

4. Real World Oncology, IQVIA, Plymouth Meeting, PA, USA

5. Advanced Analytics, IQVIA, Plymouth Meeting, PA, USA

6. Primary Intelligence, IQVIA, Gurgaon, Haryana, India

7. Primary Intelligence, IQVIA, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

Abstract

Objective. Integrative oncology is widely used by patients with breast cancer. This study aims to investigate the relationship between the survival outcomes of breast cancer patients and the level of involvement in integrative oncology at the institutions treating them. Methods. Claims-based data were used to find 4,815 newly diagnosed breast cancer patients treated between January 2013 and December 2014 for survival analysis. A scoring system was developed by asking oncologists about their institutions’ efforts to educate, support, and provide funding for 12 complementary and lifestyle approaches. Cohort analysis using two-tailed chi-square and a separate multivariate model using SMOTE and lasso regression were used. Nine variables across patient and institutional profiles were included. The model coefficients were exponentiated and presented as odds ratios. Results. 173 patients mapped to 103 institutions and 103 oncologists. The median patient age was 51, and 8% were metastatic. Institutions were scored for integrative oncology involvement and placed into four cohorts. Low-scoring institutions showed less effort to educate, support, and provide integrative therapies compared to others. The 5-year survival of patients in the low cohort was directionally but not significantly lower than others. In the multivariate model, a composite integrative oncology score was shown to increase 5-year survival odds three times for institutions in the low-mid cohort and 48% in the mid-high, compared to the low. Conclusion. Crossing the threshold beyond ‘low’ involvement in integrative oncology represents a new path to incremental survival benefit for many cancer patients. Entities invested in the survival of breast cancer patients should increase education, access, and funding for a core set of six therapies: nutrition counselling, exercise counselling, patient support groups, spiritual services, meditation, and psycho-oncology support.

Funder

IQVIA

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3