A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Comparative Kinematics in the Lumbopelvic Region in the Patients Suffering from Spinal Pain

Author:

Zheng ZhiRui1ORCID,Wang YouQiang1,Wang Tong1,Wu Yue1,Li YuHui1

Affiliation:

1. The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University Orthopedic Surgery Three Ward, Harbin, Heilonjiang, China

Abstract

Background. Lumbopelvic kinematics has been observed to include different parameters and directly relate to the movement of the hip spine. In the current scenario, more than 65 million people have been suffering from spinal pain, and 18% of adults experience chronic spinal pain. Methods. This systematic review and meta-analysis selected 9 studies for analysis via electronic databases like EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, and Cochrane (CENTRAL). After collecting the data, the dataset has been systematically analyzed through statistical methodologies using RevMan and Stata. Results. Out of 116 studies initially scrutinized, nine were finally selected for the meta-analysis. When range of motion was studied via meta-analysis, it was noted that a considerable reduced movement was noted in the lumbar region of the spine when people were suffering from lower back pain in comparison to control group people. Hence, reduced lumbar range of motion, no difference in the angle of lordosis, and no significant difference in extension and rotation in people with lower back pain were found. However, variability was noted in people suffering from lower back pain for flexion and lateral flexion. A significant heterogeneity was found between the studies which lacked some details and standardization of the criteria which were used for defining patients with lower back pain or without them (control group). Results show that spinal pain is the main reason behind the limitation of lumbar range of motion. It is clear from the data set of mean and standard deviation, and this is clear to establish the relationship between the causes of pelvic and spinal pain. In flexion-based ROM, the mean difference was found to be −9.77 (95% CI: −21.86, 2.32). Similarly, for lateral flexion, the mean difference was found to be −5.58 (with 95% CI: −10.38, −0.79). Conclusion. It can be concluded that spinal disease is too influential for people; thereby, it affects day-to-day life activities by creating painful and restricted movements. It is concluded that people suffering from lower back pain have reduced proprioception and range of movement in the lumbar region when compared to control groups with no lower back pain, which mainly focus on flexion and lateral flexion.

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

Health Informatics,Biomedical Engineering,Surgery,Biotechnology

Reference26 articles.

1. A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and analysis on color image encryption using DNA properties

2. Evaluation of the endorsement of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement on the quality of published systematic review and meta-analyses;N. Panic;PLoS One,2019

3. Hip rotation range of motion: a comparison between healthy individuals and patients with chronic low back pain;H. S. Krishna;Hip,2021

4. Recovery of the lumbopelvic movement and muscle recruitment patterns using motor control exercise program in people with chronic nonspecific low back pain: A prospective study

5. Reliability and validity of lumbopelvic kinematics related to nonspecific low back pain;C. Bauer;Journal of Medical Advancement,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3