Comparison of Predictability in Vault Using NK Formula and KS Formula for the Implantable Collamer Lens Surgery

Author:

Zhong XinORCID,Li YanORCID,Li YuancunORCID,Wang GengORCID,Du YaliORCID,Zhang MingzhiORCID

Abstract

Background. This study aims to investigate the agreement between the NK and KS formulas in predicting the vault after implantation of an EVO‐implantable collamer lens (ICL). Methods. This retrospective study included 106 eyes of 57 patients who underwent ICL‐V4c implantation. Preoperative vault prediction was conducted by utilizing the NK and KS formulas, with postoperative measurements by anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS‐OCT) at one month. The analysis focused on the consistency between predicted and achieved vaults, as well as the correlation between the achieved vault and various biometric parameters. Results. The mean achieved vault was 605.25 ± 212.72 µm, which was significantly smaller than the predicted vaults of 710.08 ± 195.08 and 673.80 ± 212.76 µm, using the NK and KS formulas, respectively (P < 0.05). The mean differences between the achieved vault and the predicted vault using the NK formula and KS formula were −104.82 μm (95% LoA: −600.38–391.19 μm) and −68.55 μm (95% LoA: −628.91–491.82 μm), respectively. Anterior chamber depth (ACD), vertical sulcus‐to‐sulcus (V‐STS) diameter, and crystalline lens rise (CLR) were independent factors associated with the achieved vault (P < 0.05). The two formulas showed no statistically significant difference in absolute prediction error (APE). Conclusion. The NK formula exhibited superior consistency and low predictive error compared to the KS formula in the 12.6 mm ICL group. AS‐OCT measurements overestimated the predicted ICL vault, especially in the 13.2 mm ICL size selection. Relying solely on the NK or KS formulas for predicting vaults before ICL surgery is not recommended.

Funder

Guangdong Medical Research Foundation

Shantou Science and Technology Project

Li Ka Shing Foundation

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3