Patient Access, Unmet Medical Need, Expected Benefits, and Concerns Related to the Utilisation of Biosimilars in Eastern European Countries: A Survey of Experts

Author:

Inotai Andras12ORCID,Csanadi Marcell13,Petrova Guenka4ORCID,Dimitrova Maria4ORCID,Bochenek Tomasz5,Tesar Tomas6,York Kristina7,Fuksa Leos8,Kostyuk Alexander9,Lorenzovici Laszlo1011,Omelyanovskiy Vitaly12,Egyed Katalin13,Kalo Zoltan12

Affiliation:

1. Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary

2. Department of Health Policy and Health Economics, Eötvös Loránd University (ELTE), Budapest, Hungary

3. Department of Pharmaceutics and Central Clinical Pharmacy, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary

4. Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University-Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria

5. Department of Drug Management, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland

6. Department of Organisation and Management in Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia

7. Management Center Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria

8. Department of Social and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Charles University in Prague, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic

9. Kazakh Agency for Health Technology Assessment, Astana, Kazakhstan

10. Syreon Research Romania, Tirgu Mures, Romania

11. Faculty of Technical and Human Sciences, Sapientia University, Tirgu Mures, Romania

12. Center of Healthcare Quality Assessment and Control, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia

13. Egis Pharmaceuticals, Budapest, Hungary

Abstract

This policy research aims to map patient access barriers to biologic treatments, to explore how increased uptake of biosimilars may lower these hurdles and to identify factors limiting the increased utilisation of biosimilars. A policy survey was developed to review these questions in 10 Central and Eastern European (CEE) and Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) countries. Two experts (one public and one private sector representative) from each country completed the survey. Questions were related to patient access, purchasing, clinical practice, and real-world data collection on both original biologics and biosimilars. Restrictions on the number of patients that can be treated and related waiting lists were reported as key patient access barriers. According to respondents, for both clinicians and payers the primary benefit of switching patients to biosimilars would be to treat more patients. However, concerns with therapeutic equivalence and fear of immunogenicity may reduce utilisation of biosimilars. Similar limitations in patient access to both original biologics and biosimilars raise concerns about the appropriateness and success of current biosimilar policies in CEE and CIS countries. The conceptual framework for additional real-world data collection exists in all countries which may provide a basis for future risk-management activities including vigorous pharmacovigilance data collection.

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

General Immunology and Microbiology,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3