Care Workers and Managers’ Experiences of Implementing Infection Control Guidance in an Epidemic Context: A Qualitative Study in the South East of England, during the COVID-19 Prevaccination Era

Author:

Bertini Lavinia1ORCID,Bogen-Johnston Leanne2,Sadhwani Shanu3,Middleton Jo14ORCID,Sharp Rebecca5,Wood Wendy6,Roland Daniel7,Forder Julien7,Cassell Jackie A.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton BN1 9PX, UK

2. School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN2 9QH, UK

3. School of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Brighton, Brighton BN2 1RA, UK

4. Evolution, Behaviour and Environment, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9RH, UK

5. Kent Surrey Sussex Academic Health Science Network, Brighton BN11 1RL, UK

6. School of Health Sciences, University of Brighton, Brighton BN20 7SP, UK

7. Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Kent CT2 7NF, UK

Abstract

The national response to COVID-19 has had a severe impact on adult social care settings, with high mortality amongst people receiving and providing care in England. Care workers had to rapidly adapt to new infection control measures to protect themselves, their colleagues, and the people receiving care. Infection control in residential and domiciliary care is always complex, but COVID-19 infection control measures impacted exceptionally on care workers’ working and everyday lives. We undertook qualitative interviews with care workers and managers (n = 10) in residential and domiciliary care for older people in the Southeast England during the first wave of the pandemic to understand their experiences, solutions, and concerns to implement guidance in practice. Data were analysed using framework analysis, and the following eight themes were identified: (1) Increasing visibility and support for the sector; (2) the impact of negative messaging about the sector; (3) feelings of isolation; (4) accessibility and usability of guidance; (5) social care staff as agents in producing and sharing good practice; (6) managing expectations and the impact of conflicting messages in the media; (7) improving communication with hospitals; and (8) problems in the early pandemic. The findings reveal widespread concerns for the marginalisation of the sector in the policy response and the inadequacy of infection control guidance. Guidance would benefit from a better understanding of domiciliary and residential care settings. This might involve the following steps: (a) coproduction of guidance with adult social care stakeholders, including those in direct-care roles and (b) a shift away from a clinical model of infection control towards a more flexible approach that attends to the inherent variability of care settings.

Funder

National Institute for Health Research

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,Sociology and Political Science,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3