Clinical Outcomes of the Marginal Ulcer Bleeding after Gastrectomy: As Compared to the Peptic Ulcer Bleeding with Nonoperated Stomach

Author:

Chung Woo Chul1,Jeon Eun Jung1,Lee Kang-Moon1,Paik Chang Nyol1,Oh You Suk1,Lee Yang Woon1,Kim Sang Bae1,Jun Kyong-Hwa2,Chin Hyung Min2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Internal Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, St. Paul's Hospital, 620-56, Jeonnong 2-dong, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 130-709, Republic of Korea

2. Department of Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul 130-709, Republic of Korea

Abstract

Background. Marginal ulcer is a well-known complication after gastrectomy. Its bleeding can be severe, but the severity has rarely been reported. We aim to evaluate the clinical outcomes of marginal ulcer bleeding (MUB) as compared to peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB) with nonoperated stomach.Methods. A consecutive series of patients who had nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding and admitted to the hospital between 2005 and 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 530 patients were enrolled in this study, and we compared the clinical characteristics between 70 patients with MUB and 460 patients with PUB.Results. Patients with MUB were older (mean age:62.86±10.59years versus53.33±16.68years,P=0.01). The initial hemoglobin was lower (8.16±3.05 g/dL versus9.38±2.49 g/dL,P=0.01), and the duration of admission was longer in MUB (7.14±4.10days versus5.90±2.97days,P=0.03). After initial hemostasis, the rebleeding rate during admission was higher (16.2% versus 6.5%,P=0.01) in MUB. However, the mortality rate did not differ statistically between MUB and PUB groups.Helicobacter pylori-positive rate with MUB was lower than that of PUB (19.4% versus 54.4%,P=0.01).Conclusions. Clinically, MUB after gastrectomy is more severe than PUB with nonoperated stomach. Infection withH. pylorimight not appear to play an important role in MUB after gastrectomy.

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

Gastroenterology,Hepatology

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3